Bug 227349 – x11-misc/basket-1.0.3.1 released (version bump)

• Status: RESOLVED FIXED
• Product: Gentoo Linux

[Description Kelvie Wong 2008-06-15 23:33:13 UTC]

I've released the newest version of BasKet Note pads, with some fixes (mainly it won't constantly access the disk when a key is pressed in most notes); I've also applied the GCC 4.3 patch from the last version.

Reproducible: Always

[Comment 1 Kelvie Wong 2008-06-15 23:33:54 UTC]

Created attachment 157009 [details]
ebuild

[Comment 2 Carsten Lohrke (RETIRED) 2008-06-30 01:56:23 UTC]

Created attachment 158907 [details]
basket-1.0.3-desktop-entry-fix.diff

[Comment 3 Carsten Lohrke (RETIRED) 2008-06-30 01:56:54 UTC]

Please pick up the attached patch, Kelvie.

[Comment 4 Kelvie Wong 2008-06-30 06:32:11 UTC]

(In reply to comment #3)
> Please pick up the attached patch, Kelvie.
> 

Thanks for the patch.  I'll push out a 1.0.3.1 release probably tomorrow (after a bit of testing).

[Comment 5 Kelvie Wong 2008-06-30 07:01:38 UTC]

Hmm, with your patch, Portage tells me this:

 * /usr/share/applications/kde/basket.desktop: value "application/x-basket-archive;application/x-basket-template;;" for key "MimeType" in group "Desktop Entry" contains value "" which does not look like a MIME type


Is that normal?

Portage 2.1.5.4 (default-linux/amd64/2007.0/desktop, gcc-4.2.4, glibc-2.7-r1, 2.6.25-gentoo-r4 x86_64)

[Comment 6 Kelvie Wong 2008-06-30 07:06:50 UTC]

(In reply to comment #5)
Silly me.  I removed the line from the ebuild that works around the bug that this patch fixes.

[Comment 7 Kelvie Wong 2008-06-30 20:56:31 UTC]

Okay, I've released 1.0.3.1 with some more minor fixes:

- your patch
- Danish translations.

The src_unpack function just needs to be remove from the ebuild (of course).

[Comment 8 Tobias Heinlein (RETIRED) 2008-07-01 19:25:47 UTC]

Thanks for the fast response! 1.0.3.1 is now in CVS.

[Comment 9 Beetle B. 2009-03-30 04:25:56 UTC]

Any reason this is still marked as unstable?

[Comment 10 Tomáš Chvátal (RETIRED) 2009-03-30 17:18:18 UTC]

(In reply to comment #9)
> Any reason this is still marked as unstable?
> 

Open a stable request if you want some application stable.

[Comment 11 Beetle B. 2009-03-30 22:30:29 UTC]

(In reply to comment #10)
> (In reply to comment #9)
> > Any reason this is still marked as unstable?
> > 
> 
> Open a stable request if you want some application stable.

Is there a procedure to do this, or do I just open a new bug with the title saying "Please mark stable"?

[Comment 12 Tomáš Chvátal (RETIRED) 2009-03-31 00:17:50 UTC]

(In reply to comment #11)
> (In reply to comment #10)
> > (In reply to comment #9)
> > > Any reason this is still marked as unstable?
> > > 
> > 
> > Open a stable request if you want some application stable.
> 
> Is there a procedure to do this, or do I just open a new bug with the title
> saying "Please mark stable"?
> 

See you deduced it correctly on the first run. So chop chop ;]