Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 225837 - media-libs/mesa-7.1_rc1 depends on >=x11-libs/libdrm-9999
Summary: media-libs/mesa-7.1_rc1 depends on >=x11-libs/libdrm-9999
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: [OLD] Library (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: High normal (vote)
Assignee: Gentoo X packagers
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2008-06-11 07:00 UTC by Neil
Modified: 2008-06-16 08:19 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Neil 2008-06-11 07:00:19 UTC
media-libs/mesa-7.1_rc1.ebuild has RDEPEND=">=x11-libs/libdrm-9999", but there is no such ebuild in portage tree (perhaps in dev's personal overlay?).

As a result, media-libs/mesa won't compile as the dependency tree can't be resolved.

Reproducible: Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Switch to ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="~x86"
2. emerge --sync
3. emerge media-libs/mesa

Actual Results:  
These are the packages that would be merged, in order:

Calculating dependencies... done!

emerge: there are no ebuilds to satisfy ">=x11-libs/libdrm-9999".
(dependency required by "media-libs/mesa-7.1_rc1" [ebuild])


Expected Results:  
media-libs/mesa should depend on an available ebuild for x11-libs/libdrm and emerge cleanly.
Comment 1 cruzki 2008-06-11 17:35:40 UTC
If you change >=x11-libs/libdrm-9999 with >=x11-libs/libdrm-2.3.1_pre20080528  compile fine
Comment 2 Donnie Berkholz (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2008-06-11 20:01:07 UTC
I'm having some issues getting mesa to work with the libdrm 2.3.1* stuff, so I'm working on that.
Comment 3 falcon 2008-06-16 07:40:58 UTC
It doesn't look to me like the ebuild itself depends on that.  Is there possibly some other reason it might?

The ebuild itself depends only on >=x11-libs/libdrm-2.3.1_pre1.
Comment 4 Neil 2008-06-16 08:19:45 UTC
(In reply to comment #3)
> It doesn't look to me like the ebuild itself depends on that.  Is there
> possibly some other reason it might?
> 
> The ebuild itself depends only on >=x11-libs/libdrm-2.3.1_pre1.
> 

That would indicate that the ebuild has been changed as Donnie Berkolz (maintainer for mesa) has resolved the issues he alluded to in the above post.

I've therefore marked this as FIXED