Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 223345 - dev-util/gtk-doc-1.10-r1 thinks it owns /usr/share/aclocal/gtk-doc.m4 but it does not.
Summary: dev-util/gtk-doc-1.10-r1 thinks it owns /usr/share/aclocal/gtk-doc.m4 but it ...
Status: RESOLVED WORKSFORME
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Current packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: High normal (vote)
Assignee: Gentoo Linux Gnome Desktop Team
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2008-05-23 13:36 UTC by Ferris McCormick (RETIRED)
Modified: 2008-05-23 14:18 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Ferris McCormick (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2008-05-23 13:36:17 UTC 
With dev-util/gtk-doc-1.10-r1, the file /usr/share/aclocal/gtk-doc.m4 has been split off into its own package, dev-util/gtk-doc-am-1.10-r1.  However, it seems that gtk-doc still thinks it owns it (or so says qlist).  This means you can end up with a system which thinks it has that .m4 file installed but does not.

This arose in processing Bug 223297.
Comment 1 Rémi Cardona (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2008-05-23 13:58:04 UTC 
$ qfile /usr/share/aclocal/gtk-doc.m4 
dev-util/gtk-doc-am (/usr/share/aclocal/gtk-doc.m4)

Try removing both gtk-doc and gtk-doc-am and rebuilding them... you may have some inconsistencies left over from older times :)
Comment 2 Gilles Dartiguelongue (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2008-05-23 14:08:07 UTC 
and don't always trust qlist, it works with prefixes so if you use qlist gtk-doc-1.10 you should not see the macro :)
Comment 3 Ferris McCormick (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2008-05-23 14:18:07 UTC 
(In reply to comment #1)
> $ qfile /usr/share/aclocal/gtk-doc.m4 
> dev-util/gtk-doc-am (/usr/share/aclocal/gtk-doc.m4)
> 
> Try removing both gtk-doc and gtk-doc-am and rebuilding them... you may have
> some inconsistencies left over from older times :)
> 

Yes, eventually everything got installed correctly.  I thought I had already done that, but I guess not.  It's my problem, so I'll quietly slink away.