Bug 220829 – app-arch/lrzip-0.19: bump->0.23, patch for execstack.

• Status: RESOLVED FIXED
• Product: Gentoo Linux

[Description Peter Alfredsen (RETIRED) 2008-05-07 23:02:38 UTC]

I noticed that lrzip needed a bump, but then QA complained about execstacks, so a patch seemed in order. Added niceness to ebuild while I was there. I know that the sham x86? depend checking is not The Right Way -- you should probably package.use.mask the flag on the archs where it doesn't work -- it gets the job done to the same effect. Nasm will never be keyworded on anything but x86 anyway.

[Comment 1 Peter Alfredsen (RETIRED) 2008-05-07 23:03:50 UTC]

Created attachment 152395 [details, diff]
lrzip-0.23-asm.patch

Fixes execstack problem, makes asm-generation configurable.

[Comment 2 Peter Alfredsen (RETIRED) 2008-05-07 23:04:31 UTC]

Created attachment 152397 [details, diff]
lrzip-0.19--0.23.ebuild.patch

Bump -> 0.23

[Comment 3 Peter Alfredsen (RETIRED) 2008-05-07 23:05:06 UTC]

I just sent ckolivas a note about the patch, BTW.

[Comment 4 Luca Barbato 2008-05-08 07:17:41 UTC]

would you mind if I just bump the lrzip version and then update once ck adds your patch upstream?

[Comment 5 Peter Alfredsen (RETIRED) 2008-05-08 07:41:09 UTC]

(In reply to comment #4)
> would you mind if I just bump the lrzip version and then update once ck adds
> your patch upstream?
> 

Sure, it's your bugs :-). but you'll get a bug about QA: blahblah: scenelf-execstackblah.

[Comment 6 .:deadhead:. 2009-12-29 19:36:30 UTC]

Hi Luca, upstream all the patches has been integrated.

Can you please close this bug and revbump lrzip to 0.43?

thank you

[Comment 7 Patrick Lauer 2010-01-07 14:48:58 UTC]

+  07 Jan 2010; Patrick Lauer <[e-mail]> +lrzip-0.43.ebuild:
+  Bump for #220829