Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 215963 - media-libs/libgphoto2-2.4.1 version dump
Summary: media-libs/libgphoto2-2.4.1 version dump
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: New packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: High enhancement (vote)
Assignee: Gentoo Linux Gnome Desktop Team
URL: http://www.gphoto.org/proj/libgphoto2/
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2008-04-02 22:41 UTC by Anton Bolshakov
Modified: 2008-04-03 22:53 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments
version 2.4.1 (libgphoto2-2.4.1.ebuild,5.72 KB, text/plain)
2008-04-02 22:42 UTC, Anton Bolshakov
Details
not sure if we still need it (libgphoto2-2.4.1-as-needed.patch,382 bytes, text/plain)
2008-04-02 22:44 UTC, Anton Bolshakov
Details
rpm patch (libgphoto2-2.4.1-rpm.patch,452 bytes, patch)
2008-04-02 22:45 UTC, Anton Bolshakov
Details | Diff
not sure if we still need it (libgphoto2-2.4.1-as-needed.patch,382 bytes, patch)
2008-04-02 22:46 UTC, Anton Bolshakov
Details | Diff

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Anton Bolshakov 2008-04-02 22:41:23 UTC
The new version is out with a lot of fixes and support of new cameras.

libgphoto2 2.4.1
Package / System integration:

    * HAL FDI files now use "info.subsystem" instead of "info.bus", required by hal after March 2008.
    * Suppress another Olympus camera in FDI file that is better of done using Mass Storage only. 

libgphoto2_port:

    * Suppress more known network filesystems in "disk" autodetection
    * disabled usb_reset for Canon cameras in "usb", broke EOS cameras.
Comment 1 Anton Bolshakov 2008-04-02 22:42:24 UTC
Created attachment 148146 [details]
version 2.4.1
Comment 2 Anton Bolshakov 2008-04-02 22:44:31 UTC
Created attachment 148147 [details]
not sure if we still need it

The patch ported from previous version, but I'm not 100% sure if we still need it.
Comment 3 Anton Bolshakov 2008-04-02 22:45:59 UTC
Created attachment 148148 [details, diff]
rpm patch
Comment 4 Anton Bolshakov 2008-04-02 22:46:42 UTC
Created attachment 148150 [details, diff]
not sure if we still need it
Comment 5 Gilles Dartiguelongue (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2008-04-03 22:53:51 UTC
that's nice but I did that some days ago already...

The as-needed patch isn't needed anymore because upstream fixed their macro.