Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 215322 - gnome-base/gvfs-0.2.1 dependency of media-libs/libgphoto2-2.4.0-r1
Summary: gnome-base/gvfs-0.2.1 dependency of media-libs/libgphoto2-2.4.0-r1
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: [OLD] GNOME (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: High normal
Assignee: Gentoo Linux Gnome Desktop Team
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2008-03-29 14:30 UTC by hmbr
Modified: 2008-04-04 16:30 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments
log of gvfs with <gphoto2-2.4.0 compile failure (gvfs-gphoto2-failure.log,2.70 KB, text/plain)
2008-03-29 16:06 UTC, Peter Sääf
Details

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description hmbr 2008-03-29 14:30:51 UTC
gvfs-0.2.1 with use gphoto2 only compiled in my system with  media-libs/libgphoto2-2.4.0-r1

Reproducible: Always
Comment 1 Mart Raudsepp gentoo-dev 2008-03-29 14:36:32 UTC
What does this mean? Please be more verbose
Comment 2 Gilles Dartiguelongue (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2008-03-29 14:58:40 UTC
and please don't skipping adding emerge --info to bugs reports, thanks.
Comment 3 Peter Sääf 2008-03-29 16:06:34 UTC
Created attachment 147636 [details]
log of gvfs with <gphoto2-2.4.0 compile failure

I can confirm that gnome-base/gvfs-0.2.1 and 0.2.2 needs >=media-libs/gphoto2-2.4.0.
Log of failure attached.
Comment 4 Waldo 2008-03-30 22:37:33 UTC
confirmed here too.  gvfs needs a dependency on libgphoto and gphoto2 > 2.4, which incidentally were keyword masked ~amd64 on my machine.

W
Comment 5 Gilles Dartiguelongue (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2008-03-30 22:51:01 UTC
(In reply to comment #4)
> confirmed here too.  gvfs needs a dependency on libgphoto and gphoto2 > 2.4,
> which incidentally were keyword masked ~amd64 on my machine.

read on: do not mix STABLE packages with _HARD_MASKED_ packages.
Comment 6 Waldo 2008-03-31 00:13:47 UTC
Hard masked or not, this was a missing dependency.  Should I not report such a bug?

W
Comment 7 Mart Raudsepp gentoo-dev 2008-03-31 01:10:17 UTC
(In reply to comment #6)
> Hard masked or not, this was a missing dependency.  Should I not report such a
> bug?

Yes you should, thank you.

Comment 8 Daniel Gryniewicz (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2008-04-04 16:30:45 UTC
Dep fixed.