Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 214305 - x11-drivers/linuxwacom-0.7.9_p8 ebuild (upgrade)
Summary: x11-drivers/linuxwacom-0.7.9_p8 ebuild (upgrade)
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: New packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: High enhancement (vote)
Assignee: Mike Auty (RETIRED)
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2008-03-22 20:17 UTC by Gautam Iyer
Modified: 2008-05-10 01:21 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments
Patch for the new ebuild (linuxwacom-0.7.9_p8.ebuild.patch,457 bytes, patch)
2008-03-22 20:20 UTC, Gautam Iyer
Details | Diff
Don't scale coordinates to screen (linuxwacom-0.7.9_p8-r1.ebuild.patch,650 bytes, text/plain)
2008-03-22 20:27 UTC, Gautam Iyer
Details

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Gautam Iyer 2008-03-22 20:17:11 UTC
Hi,

linuxwacom-0.7.8-8 was released on 2008-02-28. (http://linuxwacom.sourceforge.net/). I attach a patch for the new ebuild.

GI
Comment 1 Gautam Iyer 2008-03-22 20:20:12 UTC
Created attachment 146941 [details, diff]
Patch for the new ebuild
Comment 2 Gautam Iyer 2008-03-22 20:27:30 UTC
Created attachment 146942 [details]
Don't scale coordinates to screen

Once attachment 14864 [details] is applied to xorg-server (see bug 21433), the quirk rescale is no longer needed. (linuxwacom will still enable it by default, so I disabled it in the ebuild.

Perhaps some dependency voodoo needs to be done to check if patch 14864 has been applied or not before disabling quirk rescale, so I called the new ebuild -r1.
Comment 3 Mike Auty (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2008-03-22 21:17:34 UTC
Hiya Gautam,

Thanks for the updated ebuild.  I'll work on adding it to a testing overlay once I get back after this weekend.  There are a few typos in your report though, one of which would really help clear up your later comments.  First off I'm assuming you meant 0.7.9-8, rather than 0.7.8-8 and I've adjusted the summary accordingly.

The other typo was the bug number you mentioned.  It appears to be a digit short, and referred to a postfix bug, which didn't make much sense.  If you could let us know which bug you meant, we can investigate and figure out how best to deal with the issue...  5:)
Comment 4 Gautam Iyer 2008-03-22 21:42:00 UTC
(In reply to comment #3)

> Thanks for the updated ebuild.  I'll work on adding it to a testing overlay
> once I get back after this weekend.  There are a few typos in your report
> though, one of which would really help clear up your later comments.  First
> off I'm assuming you meant 0.7.9-8, rather than 0.7.8-8 and I've adjusted the
> summary accordingly.

Yes, I meant 0.7.9-8! Thanks for catching it!

> The other typo was the bug number you mentioned.  It appears to be a digit
> short, and referred to a postfix bug, which didn't make much sense.  If you
> could let us know which bug you meant, we can investigate and figure out how
> best to deal with the issue...  5:)

Ugh. I hate it when I can't cut and paste: I meant Bug 214233. (This has been fixed upstream, but the patches haven't yet made their way down to Gentoo. I patched all the ebuilds and filed them on Gentoo this morning, and this was one of them)

Thanks,

GI
Comment 5 Gautam Iyer 2008-05-09 17:53:10 UTC
Best close this bug and use Bug #221117 instead
Comment 6 Mike Auty (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2008-05-10 01:21:13 UTC
Yep, this hit the tree a while ago, thanks for spotting it...  5:)