Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 214229 - version ordering incorrect was: app-benchmarks/lmbench-3(.0) bump
Summary: version ordering incorrect was: app-benchmarks/lmbench-3(.0) bump
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: New packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: High enhancement (vote)
Assignee: Daniel Black (RETIRED)
URL: http://www.bitmover.com/lmbench/get_l...
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on: 197552
Blocks:
  Show dependency tree
 
Reported: 2008-03-22 10:23 UTC by Auke Booij (tulcod)
Modified: 2008-05-17 11:02 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Auke Booij (tulcod) 2008-03-22 10:23:29 UTC
lmbench 3.0 has been released (ages ago). Please bump this ebuild to 3.0

I tried doing this, the first problem was that you have to set MY_P to lmbench3. I don't know the most elegant solution to do this.
And even then, there are some modifications in the makefile, so those need to be sorted out too.

Reproducible: Always

Steps to Reproduce:
Comment 1 Daniel Black (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2008-04-01 14:24:07 UTC
name the ebuild lmbench-3.ebuild
set MY_P to ${PN}${PV}

if you have a working ebuild that would be great. Feel free to ask for help on #gentoo-dev-help on the freenode irc network.
Comment 2 Daniel Black (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2008-05-03 01:04:15 UTC
added - let me know if you have problems with it.
Comment 3 Auke Booij (tulcod) 2008-05-15 16:07:32 UTC
Thanks daniel, it works fine. But shouldn't the version in portage be named 3.0, as opposed to just 3?
Comment 4 Daniel Black (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2008-05-15 18:06:32 UTC
upstream authors called it version 3 so i'll call it the same
http://www.bitmover.com/lmbench/get_lmbench.html
Comment 5 Auke Booij (tulcod) 2008-05-15 18:30:42 UTC
Hm, I get your point. However, how to deal with the alpha package then? Should that be removed or what? Cause that one gets preferred right now. Maybe rename to lmbench-3_alpha3?
Comment 6 Daniel Black (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2008-05-16 23:36:51 UTC
your quite right with the ordering of which is latest.
options:
1. make 3 stable in 15 days or so and remove the old one?
2. some funny numbering thing

i'm keen on option 1.
Comment 7 Auke Booij (tulcod) 2008-05-17 10:21:54 UTC
well, the funny numbering thing could be funny and exciting too. so why not :P
btw, can't 3.0_alpha3 be renamed to 3_alpha3?
if not, then wait a few days (might not be needed imo, but i guess that's just standard procedure) and remove the alpha version.
Comment 8 Daniel Black (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2008-05-17 11:02:06 UTC
(In reply to comment #7)
> well, the funny numbering thing could be funny and exciting too. so why not :P
> btw, can't 3.0_alpha3 be renamed to 3_alpha3?

quite right - done. Bit ugly as those update from 3.0_alpha3 to 3_alpha3 but I can live with that.

Thanks