Been there for a while; will be needed for texlive (and should be the last one that can go before the whole texlive ebuilds).
Testing with texlive, I note that to run the examples, I also need to have the texlive-langcjk package; otherwise, lots of fonts are missing. Is this a problem or not?
(In reply to comment #1) > Testing with texlive, I note that to run the examples, I also need to have the > texlive-langcjk package; otherwise, lots of fonts are missing. Is this a > problem or not? This is a good question; I'm enclined to say it's not a problem as you can specify fonts you want in your documents (and thus have missing fonts if you don't have 'em). However, if you really can't process any single file without texlive-langcjk, we could add this rdep: || ( texlive-langcjk tetex (I'm not sure it has more fonts) ptex (which will most likely have lots of such fonts) ) I didnt do this since cjk-latex comes with a good bunch of fonts, I assumed it doesnt really need more.
Sparc stable, this works as expected. The examples causing problems seem to ask for fonts from texlang-cjk explicitly. So some of the examples assume the langcjk fonts, but not all. I don't think cjk-latex needs more fonts, and I don't know why its examples assume the availability of cjk fonts it doesn't supply.
ppc64 stable
x86/amd64 stable
Stable for HPPA.
alpha/ia64 stable
ppc stable and closing
