Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 21396 - squeak-vm-3.5.5180.ebuild (New)
Summary: squeak-vm-3.5.5180.ebuild (New)
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: New packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: High enhancement (vote)
Assignee: Michael Imhof (RETIRED)
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2003-05-21 03:35 UTC by Christopher Verges
Modified: 2003-05-30 10:47 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments
Changelog for ebuild (squeak-vm-3.5.5180.ChangeLog,276 bytes, text/plain)
2003-05-21 03:35 UTC, Christopher Verges
Details
Actual ebuild (squeak-vm-3.5.5180.ebuild,870 bytes, text/plain)
2003-05-21 03:35 UTC, Christopher Verges
Details
New build that works (squeak-vm-3.5.5180.ebuild,1.06 KB, text/plain)
2003-05-21 10:50 UTC, Christopher Verges
Details

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Christopher Verges 2003-05-21 03:35:14 UTC
New squeak-vm-3.5.5180.ebuild for inclusion into Portage tree.  lintool reports
0 errors, 0 warnings.  This version of the ebuild will run with ANY squeak
version, choosing the latest version in Portage as the default to install if no
version has been previously installed.  Squeak operates on the principle of a
virtual machine and an image file.  In portage, the virtual machine is the
dev-lang/squeak package, and the image file is the dev-lang/squeak-vm package. 
A little convoluted, but hey ... This ebuild will install the Squeak 3.5-5180
image file; it RDEPENDS on ANY squeak image to be installed (dev-lang/squeak),
and will install the latest version in Portage if that dependency fails.  This
makes this version of the ebuild backwards compatible with Squeak 3.2.* virtual
machines.

Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
Comment 1 Christopher Verges 2003-05-21 03:35:33 UTC
Created attachment 12231 [details]
Changelog for ebuild
Comment 2 Christopher Verges 2003-05-21 03:35:47 UTC
Created attachment 12232 [details]
Actual ebuild
Comment 3 Michael Imhof (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2003-05-21 07:42:46 UTC
Ok, i checked this ebuild in, please have a look if everything is correct and report back.
Comment 4 Christopher Verges 2003-05-21 09:26:47 UTC
Looks great.  Thanks for taking care of this so quickly!
Comment 5 Christopher Verges 2003-05-21 09:44:27 UTC
Actually, I take that back.  Don't close this quite yet ... testing something right now that worked earlier but isn't now.  :-)
Comment 6 Michael Imhof (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2003-05-21 10:36:39 UTC
Okies, i closed the other two bugs, but will let this one open until i hear something from you.
Comment 7 Christopher Verges 2003-05-21 10:50:44 UTC
Created attachment 12252 [details]
New build that works

The Squeak.org people changed the way their image/changes files were
distributed.  It definitely foobar'd the installation.	I have changed the
ebuild to reflect the new method of distribution, so all should work fine.
Comment 8 Christopher Verges 2003-05-22 23:33:13 UTC
Waiting for latest ebuild to make it to portage to double check it ...
Comment 9 Michael Imhof (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2003-05-23 13:36:38 UTC
Ok, i checked i your corrected ebuild one minute ago :-)
Comment 10 Christopher Verges 2003-05-23 18:46:24 UTC
All ebuilds work properly.  The next question: How does one go about getting them unmasked?
Comment 11 Michael Imhof (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2003-05-26 17:22:33 UTC
Unmasking depends on how stable the ebuild is.
So if many people report it as stable it's normally unmasked.

If you can tell me that it's save to unmask it, then i'll do so, but i think we should ask Jared Hudson <jhhudso@gentoo.org>.
Comment 12 Christopher Verges 2003-05-30 02:43:56 UTC
No, that's OK.  I was just wondering how that process worked mostly.  The FAQ off the Gentoo site doesn't really go into details about that ... more of the mechanisms behind Portage.  Thanks a bunch for your help!  AFAIK, this bug can be closed then.
Comment 13 Michael Imhof (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2003-05-30 10:47:01 UTC
Okies, so I'm closing this bug now.
Thanks for your help.