Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 211035 - sci-libs/libgeda-1.4.0: mandatory /usr/share/gEDA/system-gafrc file not installed
Summary: sci-libs/libgeda-1.4.0: mandatory /usr/share/gEDA/system-gafrc file not insta...
Status: RESOLVED WORKSFORME
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: New packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: High normal (vote)
Assignee: The Soldering-Iron Brotherhood
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2008-02-21 21:03 UTC by Denis de La Fortelle
Modified: 2008-03-15 18:27 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Denis de La Fortelle 2008-02-21 21:03:33 UTC
After updating to 1.4.0 from 20070526.
When starting gschem, the Messages box show that the mandatory /usr/share/gEDA/system-gafrc file is not installed.
It is located in the libgeda package.

It should be installed if not already present, and if present the user should be warned to proceed to a merge. That is a procedure like for /etc files.

Reproducible: Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. (re)move the /usr/share/gEDA/system-gafrc file
2.~$ gschem
3.look at the beginning of the message box.

Actual Results:  
When starting gschem, the Messages box show that the mandatory /usr/share/gEDA/system-gafrc file is not installed.

Expected Results:  
Message box does not list the mandatory /usr/share/gEDA/system-gafrc file as missing.

Thanks anyway.
Comment 1 Denis Dupeyron (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2008-03-15 18:27:42 UTC
(In reply to comment #0)
> After updating to 1.4.0 from 20070526.
> When starting gschem, the Messages box show that the mandatory
> /usr/share/gEDA/system-gafrc file is not installed.
> It is located in the libgeda package.

Sorry, I can't reproduce this here. The system-gafrc file is normally installed. Please unmerge and remerge and check it works as expected.

> It should be installed if not already present, and if present the user should
> be warned to proceed to a merge. That is a procedure like for /etc files.

If it already exists it is a file collision and should be fixed. Please file a bug whenever you see this.

> and if present the user should
> be warned to proceed to a merge. That is a procedure like for /etc files.

Please open a bug any time you want to submit a patch for an enhancement you'd like. Unless it's completely unreasonable, I'll be happy to commit it.

Denis.