Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 20957 - openldap-2.0.25-r2 removed => system nearly stops working
Summary: openldap-2.0.25-r2 removed => system nearly stops working
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: New packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: High critical (vote)
Assignee: Alastair Tse (RETIRED)
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2003-05-13 15:12 UTC by christian gut
Modified: 2003-06-22 05:55 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description christian gut 2003-05-13 15:12:55 UTC
today i got very angry.

stable tree (x86) was on openldap-2.0.25-r2. after rsync portage proposed
downgrade of it to -r1. i thought: ok the might know why... so after that i
noticed that the complete ldap-db was empty... coudlnt be...

solution:
in -r1 the useflag berkdb isnt present (dunno why, has always been there). so
slapd now makes a new db with .gdbm instead of .dbb as suffix.

thisone sucks extremly i think. such things shouldnt happen in the stable tree,
or if so, that should be in a changelog....

the -r2 has been removed from portage? why?

Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1.rsync
2.emerge -u openldap
3.=> slapd stops working
Comment 1 Alastair Tse (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2003-05-13 21:25:09 UTC
if you are using x86, the latest stable is openldap-2.0.27-r0.

have you got it masked for some reason? can you paste your emerge info? 
Comment 2 christian gut 2003-05-14 01:38:28 UTC
have nothing masked myself. this is reproducable, was tested on an other machine.

both are on 1.2 profile still, might be thats the problem...
extremely weird what i see here

output from etcat:
*  net-nds/openldap :
        [   ] net-nds/openldap-1.2.13-r6 (0)
        [   ] net-nds/openldap-2.0.25-r1 (0)
        [  I] net-nds/openldap-2.0.25-r2 (0)
        [M  ] net-nds/openldap-2.0.25-r3 (0)
        [M  ] net-nds/openldap-2.0.27 (0)
        [M~ ] net-nds/openldap-2.0.27-r1 (0)
        [M~ ] net-nds/openldap-2.0.27-r2 (0)
        [M~ ] net-nds/openldap-2.0.27-r3 (0)
        [M  ] net-nds/openldap-2.1.9 (0)
        [M  ] net-nds/openldap-2.1.10 (0)
        [M  ] net-nds/openldap-2.1.12 (0)
        [M  ] net-nds/openldap-2.1.19 (0)

(%)grep openldap /usr/portage/profiles/package.mask
=net-nds/openldap-2.1.9
=net-nds/openldap-2.0.25-r3

(%)emerge info
Portage 2.0.47-r10 (default-1.0, gcc-2.95.3, glibc-2.2.5-r2,2.2.5-r8)
=================================================================
System uname: 2.4.20-gentoo-r2 i686
GENTOO_MIRRORS="ftp://ftp.fu-berlin.de/unix/linux/mirrors/gentoo/ ftp://sunsite.dk/mirrors/gentoo/ http://gentoo.linux.no http://www.ibiblio.org/pub/Linux/distributions/gentoo"
CONFIG_PROTECT="/etc /var/qmail/control /usr/share/config /usr/kde/2/share/config /usr/kde/3/share/config"
CONFIG_PROTECT_MASK="/etc/gconf /etc/env.d"
PORTDIR="/usr/portage"
DISTDIR="/usr/portage/distfiles"
PKGDIR="/usr/portage/packages"
PORTAGE_TMPDIR="/var/tmp"
PORTDIR_OVERLAY=""
USE="x86 oss 3dnow apm avi crypt encode gif imlib jpeg libg++ libwww mikmod mmx mpeg ncurses oggvorbis pdflib sdl spell truetype xml2 xmms xv berkdb gdbm java nls pam png python readline slang snmp ssl tcpd tiff -cups -arts -gpm -gtk -kde ldap -motif mysql -opengl perl postgres -qt -qtmt -quicktime -svga -X"
COMPILER=""
CHOST="i686-pc-linux-gnu"
CFLAGS="-march=i686 -O3 -pipe"
CXXFLAGS="-march=i686 -O3 -pipe"
ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="x86"
MAKEOPTS="-j2"
AUTOCLEAN="yes"
SYNC="rsync://rsync.de.gentoo.org/gentoo-portage"
FEATURES="sandbox ccache"
Comment 3 Alastair Tse (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2003-05-14 04:47:03 UTC
ok. that would make sense. the default-1.0 profile doesn't have readline-4.1 and hence the newer versions were masked. i've restored 2.0.25-r2 for now. 

i've added documentation to the ebuild to make sure we don't remove it in the future. the previous maintainer was kind enough to not leave any hints about why we need this old version.
Comment 4 christian gut 2003-05-14 05:03:17 UTC
hm.. ok so far. will that profile get the readline update somewhen?
Comment 5 Alastair Tse (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2003-05-14 05:35:31 UTC
not too sure what is holding up readline for 1.0 profile. #12440 is the bug about why openldap-2.0.27 is not available for those profiles.
Comment 6 Alastair Tse (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2003-06-22 04:36:47 UTC
seemant, maybe you would like to keep this in mind when you clean out openldap ;)
Comment 7 Seemant Kulleen (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2003-06-22 05:55:39 UTC
bah, I'm sorry -- I saw like 8 different ebuilds so I cleaned house carelessly.  apologies.