208871 – net-im/ejabberd requires patching for correct SSL functionality

Bug 208871 - net-im/ejabberd requires patching for correct SSL functionality

Summary: net-im/ejabberd requires patching for correct SSL functionality

Status:	RESOLVED WONTFIX

Alias:	None

Product:	Gentoo Linux
Classification:	Unclassified
Component:	New packages (show other bugs)
Hardware:	All Linux

Importance:	High normal (vote)
Assignee:	Caleb Tennis (RETIRED)

URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Depends on:
Blocks:

Reported:	2008-02-04 18:40 UTC by Luke-Jr
Modified:	2010-01-18 20:27 UTC (History)
CC List:	3 users (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required:	---

Attachments
-r2 ebuild applying bugfix (ejabberd-1.1.4-r2.ebuild,3.44 KB, text/plain) 2008-02-04 18:56 UTC, Luke-Jr	Details
Bugfix patch (ejabberd-1.1.4-certificate-chain.patch,510 bytes, patch) 2008-02-04 18:57 UTC, Luke-Jr	Details \| Diff
Bugfix patch (ejabberd-1.1.4-certificate-chain.patch,492 bytes, patch) 2008-02-04 19:12 UTC, Luke-Jr	Details \| Diff
Show Obsolete (1) View All Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Description Luke-Jr 2008-02-04 18:40:35 UTC

https://support.process-one.net/browse/EJAB-209

Ebuild patch in progress

Comment 1 Luke-Jr 2008-02-04 18:56:40 UTC

Created attachment 142669 [details]
-r2 ebuild applying bugfix

Comment 2 Luke-Jr 2008-02-04 18:57:27 UTC

Created attachment 142670 [details, diff]
Bugfix patch

I couldn't get the patch in EJAB-209 to apply cleanly, so I edited it manually and made a new one.

Comment 3 Luke-Jr 2008-02-04 19:12:21 UTC

Created attachment 142672 [details, diff]
Bugfix patch

Missed part of the patch...

Comment 4 Luke-Jr 2008-03-30 22:44:37 UTC

Since it apparently takes months and months to merge a simple patch, I'm adding this to my overlay. layman -ka luke-jr

Comment 5 Luke-Jr 2009-09-18 16:08:34 UTC

Is this a WONTFIX?

Comment 6 Peter Volkov (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2010-01-18 20:26:48 UTC

Luke-Jr, sorry for taking really long time to get here. Currently ejabberd-1.4 does not exist in the tree and 2.x should work with ssl. If there is anything left here, please, reopen. In any case I think it's worth to upgrade on 2.0 (or 2.1 which I'm going to add soon) branch of ejabberd. Thank you for report, and don't let this experience stop you from filling new bugs.

Comment 7 Peter Volkov (RETIRED) gentoo-dev

2010-01-18 20:27:23 UTC

Really closing.