Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 200814 - x11-libs/gtk+-2.12.2 is out
Summary: x11-libs/gtk+-2.12.2 is out
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: [OLD] GNOME (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: High enhancement (vote)
Assignee: Gentoo Linux Gnome Desktop Team
URL: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cg...
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2007-11-30 08:53 UTC by Alexandre Rostovtsev (RETIRED)
Modified: 2008-01-10 22:36 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments
gtk+-2.12.2.ebuild (gtk+-2.12.2.ebuild,4.38 KB, text/plain)
2007-11-30 08:54 UTC, Alexandre Rostovtsev (RETIRED)
Details

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Alexandre Rostovtsev (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2007-11-30 08:53:01 UTC
gtk+-2.12.2 was released 4 days ago. Please bump.
Comment 1 Alexandre Rostovtsev (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2007-11-30 08:54:18 UTC
Created attachment 137377 [details]
gtk+-2.12.2.ebuild

A working ebuild. Removed 2 of the patches found in the previous ebuild since they were fixed in 2.12.2
Comment 2 Rémi Cardona (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2007-11-30 09:00:28 UTC
A 4-day bump request is hardly better than a 0-day bump request...
Comment 3 Mart Raudsepp gentoo-dev 2007-11-30 09:27:49 UTC
I'm fully aware that there is a new release out. However, this is not in portage on purpose as it comes with two third of the gtk reference documentation missing due to an issue with gtk-doc or gtk+'s usage of it in gtktoolbar.h documentation.
Upstream is working on this issue and will release a brown-paper bug release as soon as this is fixed or worked around. Once that is done, that bump will go into portage, not this version that failed my QA.
Additionally a test fails in it, but for that I already have a patch and it won't be a problem in 2.12.3 - http://svn.gnome.org/viewvc/gtk%2B?view=revision&revision=19076
Comment 4 Alexandre Rostovtsev (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2007-11-30 14:41:03 UTC
(In reply to comment #3)
Thanks for the explanation.
Comment 5 younker 2007-12-04 04:07:43 UTC
Thanks for your explaination on this, this makes our gentoo more stable.
Comment 6 Rafał Mużyło 2007-12-06 19:51:17 UTC
I'll be my annoying self and note that 2.12.3 has been announced on the mailing list on Wed,  5 Dec 2007 04:52:07 +0000 (GMT).
Comment 7 younker 2007-12-10 07:02:50 UTC
I checked the changelog of 2.12.3, it seems the bug you mentioned has been fixed in this version, so when will 2.12.3 enter portage?

(In reply to comment #3)
> I'm fully aware that there is a new release out. However, this is not in
> portage on purpose as it comes with two third of the gtk reference
> documentation missing due to an issue with gtk-doc or gtk+'s usage of it in
> gtktoolbar.h documentation.
> Upstream is working on this issue and will release a brown-paper bug release as
> soon as this is fixed or worked around. Once that is done, that bump will go
> into portage, not this version that failed my QA.
> Additionally a test fails in it, but for that I already have a patch and it
> won't be a problem in 2.12.3 -
> http://svn.gnome.org/viewvc/gtk%2B?view=revision&revision=19076
> 

Comment 8 Mart Raudsepp gentoo-dev 2007-12-10 07:33:55 UTC
There are bugs filed against 2.12.3 that say it rebuilds the docs regardless of --disable-gtk-doc (lack of USE=doc) and that will fail similarly as 2.12.2 did, as we do not have the fix for gtk-doc because it isn't released yet. I need to take some time to figure all this out, maybe a gtk-doc-1.9 version bump with the necessary patch included for gtk+ docs build (for the USE=doc case) and a patch to fix the dishonoring of --disable-gtk-doc to gtk+-2.12.3, if that's a real problem.
Comment 9 Rémi Cardona (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2008-01-09 07:45:42 UTC
Before anyone complains, we _know_ gtk+ 2.12.5 is out. Thanks
Comment 10 Gilles Dartiguelongue (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2008-01-10 22:36:49 UTC
gtk+-2.12.5 is in tree, it has several fixes including the doc generation part.