Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 199493 - app-doc/podbrowser-0.11a version bump
Summary: app-doc/podbrowser-0.11a version bump
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: New packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: High enhancement (vote)
Assignee: Gentoo Perl team
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords: EBUILD
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2007-11-18 05:33 UTC by Joshua Rich
Modified: 2008-05-13 11:48 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---

Attachments
ebuild for version 0.11a (podbrowser-0.11a.ebuild,952 bytes, text/plain)
2007-11-18 05:35 UTC, Joshua Rich 		Details
patch required for ebuild version 0.11a (podbrowser-makefile.patch,1.41 KB, patch)
2007-11-18 05:36 UTC, Joshua Rich 		Details | Diff
View All Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Joshua Rich 2007-11-18 05:33:21 UTC 
I'm attaching an updated ebuild for the latest version of podbrowser.  Current version in portage is 0.09.  This new ebuild is for version 0.11a (released September this year).

Reproducible: Always
Comment 1 Joshua Rich 2007-11-18 05:35:44 UTC 
Created attachment 136213 [details]
ebuild for version 0.11a
Comment 2 Joshua Rich 2007-11-18 05:36:51 UTC 
Created attachment 136215 [details, diff]
patch required for ebuild version 0.11a
Comment 3 Joshua Rich 2008-03-16 11:04:57 UTC 
There is a new stable version of podbrowser v0.12 and the ebuild for v0.11a posted on this bug works without any internal changes when renamed.  The patch is still required.

Regards,

Joshua Rich
Comment 4 Torsten Veller (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2008-05-13 11:04:28 UTC 
0.12 is in the tree now.

Is anything wrong with the Makefile already in the files/ directory?
Comment 5 Joshua Rich 2008-05-13 11:48:09 UTC 
(In reply to comment #4)
> 0.12 is in the tree now.
> 
> Is anything wrong with the Makefile already in the files/ directory?
> 

Hi Torsten,

No, there is nothing wrong with using the Makefile in the files/ directory.  I was using the patch so I could use epatch on the existing Makefile shipped with podbrowser rather than overwriting it with the Makefile from $FILESDIR. Either way achieves the same effect.  Sorry for causing confusion, I should have explained what the patch was trying to do when I attached it to this bug.

Cheers,

Joshua