I couldn't find an ebuild nor a report in here. OpenLDAP 2.4 is released for general use now. Related doc - http://www.openldap.org/software/release/ Changes - http://www.openldap.org/software/release/announce.html Download - http://www.openldap.org/software/download/ Finally it can do multi master replication :) Reproducible: Always
How is the ebuild coming along? Hope to test out the new multi master replication with 2.4.
currently the latest available version is 2.4.7...
Created attachment 139521 [details] Initial 2.4.7 ebuild I created this ebuild by just copying the openldap-2.3.39-r2 ebuild and removing the ntlm patch that fails. It compiles for me and I haven't found any problems with it.
I reworked the current ebuild to make it 2.4 happy, added to cvs now on the todo list for it is still the contrib modules part we have in 2.3 though it needs sane makefiles this time, not willing to maintain a 17k ebuild again without reason.
There is some problem with upgrading from 2.3 to 2.4 See this report on Debian BTS: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=462099 I just tried to set up a gentoo 2.4.7 replica, and slapd won't start because of the entryCSN format sent by syncrepl (from a Debian 2.3.38 master). When started on the command line, slapd spit this on stdout after initializing syncrepl: slapd: schema_init.c:3669: csnNormalize: Assertion `val->bv_len == (sizeof("YYYYmmddHHMMSS.uuuuuuZ#SSSSSS#SID#ssssss")-1)' failed. I don't know if we need to open another bug report for this matter
> I just tried to set up a gentoo 2.4.7 replica, and slapd won't start because of > the entryCSN format sent by syncrepl (from a Debian 2.3.38 master). You need 2.3.40 for this to work
Created attachment 153439 [details, diff] 2.4.9 bump with db-4.6 dep (experimental) Since I have and want only one db-4.x installed and db-4.6 got unmasked again.
I bumped it to 2.4.10. With a little helper function you don't need Makefiles :-)
Works sanely with recent versions
what's the current status and roadmap for OL 2.4?
ping
wschlich: why the ping here? This bug is closed, and 2.4 has been around a long time.