Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 198992 - Stable request for dev-java/commons-io-1.3.2
Summary: Stable request for dev-java/commons-io-1.3.2
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: [OLD] Java (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: High normal (vote)
Assignee: Java team
URL: http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/java/ge...
Whiteboard:
Keywords: STABLEREQ
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2007-11-12 23:36 UTC by Petteri Räty (RETIRED)
Modified: 2007-11-25 09:34 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Petteri Räty (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2007-11-12 23:36:10 UTC
*commons-io-1.3.2 (03 Aug 2007)

  03 Aug 2007; Petteri Räty <betelgeuse@gentoo.org>
  -files/commons-io-1.1-gentoo.diff, +commons-io-1.3.2.ebuild:
  Version bump.
Comment 1 Christian Faulhammer (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2007-11-13 07:11:07 UTC
    [junit] Testcase: testAgeFilter took 2.016 sec
    [junit]     FAILED
    [junit] Filter(File) org.apache.commons.io.filefilter.AgeFileFilter not false for /var/tmp/portage/dev-java/commons-io-1.3.
2/work/commons-io-1.3.2-src/test/io/new.txt
    [junit] junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: Filter(File) org.apache.commons.io.filefilter.AgeFileFilter not false for /va
r/tmp/portage/dev-java/commons-io-1.3.2/work/commons-io-1.3.2-src/test/io/new.txt
    [junit]     at org.apache.commons.io.filefilter.FileFilterTestCase.assertFiltering(FileFilterTestCase.java:69)
    [junit]     at org.apache.commons.io.filefilter.FileFilterTestCase.testAgeFilter(FileFilterTestCase.java:635)
    [junit]
    [junit] Testcase: testSizeFilter took 0.004 sec
    [junit] Testcase: testHidden took 0.002 sec
    [junit] Testcase: testCanRead took 0.004 sec
    [junit]     FAILED
    [junit] Filter(File) org.apache.commons.io.filefilter.AndFileFilter not true for /var/tmp/portage/dev-java/commons-io-1.3.2/work/commons-io-1.3.2-src/test/io/read-only-file1.txt
    [junit] junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: Filter(File) org.apache.commons.io.filefilter.AndFileFilter not true for /var/tmp/portage/dev-java/commons-io-1.3.2/work/commons-io-1.3.2-src/test/io/read-only-file1.txt
    [junit]     at org.apache.commons.io.filefilter.FileFilterTestCase.assertFiltering(FileFilterTestCase.java:69)
    [junit]     at org.apache.commons.io.filefilter.FileFilterTestCase.testCanRead(FileFilterTestCase.java:703)
    [junit]
    [junit] Testcase: testCanWrite took 0.002 sec
    [junit]     FAILED
    [junit] Filter(File) org.apache.commons.io.filefilter.CanWriteFileFilter not false for /var/tmp/portage/dev-java/commons-io-1.3.2/work/commons-io-1.3.2-src/test/io/read-only-file2.txt
    [junit] junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: Filter(File) org.apache.commons.io.filefilter.CanWriteFileFilter not false for /var/tmp/portage/dev-java/commons-io-1.3.2/work/commons-io-1.3.2-src/test/io/read-only-file2.txt
    [junit]     at org.apache.commons.io.filefilter.FileFilterTestCase.assertFiltering(FileFilterTestCase.java:69)
    [junit]     at org.apache.commons.io.filefilter.FileFilterTestCase.testCanWrite(FileFilterTestCase.java:713)
    [junit]
    [junit] Testcase: testEmpty took 0.004 sec

Without FEATURES=userpriv, there is one test failure less (the first one).  Tested with eclass patch from bug 142538, 1.3.1 succeeds.
Comment 2 Dawid Węgliński (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2007-11-17 23:50:30 UTC
Everything passes here.
x86 stable
Comment 3 Markus Rothe (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2007-11-18 17:50:51 UTC
ppc64 stable
Comment 4 William L. Thomson Jr. (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2007-11-19 18:27:19 UTC
amd64 stable
Comment 5 Samuli Suominen (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2007-11-24 17:43:27 UTC
Reproduced the test failure here in amd64.. I wonder why it was marked stable.
Comment 6 Petteri Räty (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2007-11-24 17:55:45 UTC
(In reply to comment #5)
> Reproduced the test failure here in amd64.. I wonder why it was marked stable.
> 

Yeah I don't know why people did that. Any way I fixed them.
Comment 7 Petteri Räty (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2007-11-24 17:56:30 UTC
ppc still left, reopening
Comment 8 William L. Thomson Jr. (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2007-11-24 20:55:23 UTC
I marked it stable because first time I tested package it failed tests. Then time went by, I think a week or so. Other archs marked it stable. I re-ran tests, they passed. I compiled deps against package, etc and so on. I saw no problems, thus marked it stable.
Comment 9 Krzysztof Pawlik (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2007-11-25 09:34:01 UTC
ppc done, closing bug as we're the last arch.