Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 198812 - dev-libs/glib-2.14 < 2.14.3 Multiple issues in embedded PCRE
Summary: dev-libs/glib-2.14 < 2.14.3 Multiple issues in embedded PCRE
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Security
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Vulnerabilities (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: High trivial (vote)
Assignee: Gentoo Security
URL: http://mail.gnome.org/archives/gtk-de...
Whiteboard: ~2 [noglsa]
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2007-11-11 14:48 UTC by Robert Buchholz (RETIRED)
Modified: 2007-11-11 17:08 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Robert Buchholz (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2007-11-11 14:48:20 UTC
glib since 2.14 ships a copy of PCRE which is be vulnerable to several security issues as pointed out in bug #198198.

PCRE 7.3 fixes the issues mentioned, and it was included with glib 2.14.3.

Gnome, since 2.14.3 is in the tree already, please remove the vulnerable version (2.14.2).

My greatest urge: Can you please update your 2.14 ebuilds to add "--with-pcre=system" to configure, so the included copy of PCRE will not be compiled and used?
Comment 1 Robert Buchholz (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2007-11-11 14:53:11 UTC
I'll leave this open to get a comment from gnome.
Comment 2 Mart Raudsepp gentoo-dev 2007-11-11 15:02:54 UTC
ok, so:

a) I have removed 2.14.2 from the tree, now that no-one has reported 2.14.3 breaking anything otherwise during the few days

b) A vulnerable glib has never been in the stable tree

c) We can not just pass --with-pcre=system and loose the memory, unicode and other patches that are applied - not without knowing what we loose. Care to help find out?
Comment 3 Robert Buchholz (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2007-11-11 17:08:22 UTC
I didn't know they shipped a *patched* version of PCRE. If you need it, I won't make you use the system version.

What we'll lose is that we only have to security-support the PCRE in one place, so it would be good if those patches were introduced into PCRE upstream. For now, I'll note glib on our code copy list then and hope gnome upstream is responsive to all issues.