Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 19862 - development-sources 2.5.68 broken in several places compared to 2.5.66 and 2.5.67
Summary: development-sources 2.5.68 broken in several places compared to 2.5.66 and 2....
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: [OLD] Unspecified (show other bugs)
Hardware: x86 Linux
: High normal (vote)
Assignee: x86-kernel@gentoo.org (DEPRECATED)
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2003-04-23 21:07 UTC by Guy
Modified: 2003-05-04 13:41 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Guy 2003-04-23 21:07:11 UTC
After compiling a new linux-beta kernel using the 2.5.68 development sources and
using the same options as I specified in 2.5.66 and 2.5.67, I've encountered two
different problems.

1) adsl-start won't connect.

2) I cannot start a konsole of any kind after bringing up the KDE desktop. This
is because I get a messege to the effect that there are no more available 'pty'
virtual ports available.

Neither problem occurs with vanilla-sources 2.4.20, development-sources 2.5.66
or development sources 2.5.67.

If someone could specify what info and where to get it on my system in order to
identify the root cause(s) of these problems, I would be happy to provide it.

I'm providing the 'emerge info' from my 2.4.20 kernel to give you an idea of
what my system settings and configurations are. FWIW, I've multi-booted my
system so can give you any info you require from any of the mentioned kernels.

Best regards,
Guy

dragon root # emerge info
Portage 2.0.47-r10 (default-x86-1.4, gcc-3.2.2, glibc-2.3.2-r1)
=================================================================
System uname: 2.4.20 i686 AMD Athlon(TM) XP1500+
GENTOO_MIRRORS=" ftp://csociety-ftp.ecn.purdue.edu/pub/gentoo/
ftp://ftp.gtlib.cc.gatech.edu/pub/gentoo
http://212.219.56.162/sites/www.ibiblio.org/gentoo/
http://194.83.57.2/sites/www.ibiblio.org/gentoo/
http://194.83.57.3/sites/www.ibiblio.org/gentoo/"
CONFIG_PROTECT="/etc /var/qmail/control /usr/kde/2/share/config
/usr/kde/3/share/config /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/xkb /usr/kde/3.1/share/config
/usr/share/texmf/tex/generic/config/ /usr/share/texmf/tex/platex/config/
/usr/share/config"
CONFIG_PROTECT_MASK="/etc/gconf /etc/env.d"
PORTDIR="/usr/portage"
DISTDIR="/usr/portage/distfiles"
PKGDIR="/usr/portage/packages"
PORTAGE_TMPDIR="/var/tmp"
PORTDIR_OVERLAY=""
USE="x86 oss 3dnow apm avi crypt cups encode gif jpeg gnome libg++ mikmod mmx
mpeg ncurses nls pdflib png quicktime spell truetype xml2 xmms xv zlib gtkhtml
alsa gdbm berkdb slang readline arts tetex nas bonobo svga ggi tcltk java guile
mysql X sdl gpm tcpd pam libwww ssl perl python esd imlib oggvorbis gtk qt kde
motif opengl mozilla cdr"
COMPILER="gcc3"
CHOST="i686-pc-linux-gnu"
CFLAGS="-mcpu=athlon-xp -O3 -pipe"
CXXFLAGS="-mcpu=athlon-xp -O3 -pipe"
ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="x86 ~x86"
MAKEOPTS="-j1"
AUTOCLEAN="yes"
SYNC="rsync://rsync.gentoo.org/gentoo-portage"
FEATURES="sandbox ccache"

dragon root #

Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
Comment 1 Peter Gantner (a.k.a. nephros) 2003-04-25 04:46:49 UTC
Problem number two is not a bug, but a feature.

The devpty filesystem is not in devfs anymore. You have to compile it in extra, and create a fstab entry for it.

See also bug #19845.
Comment 2 Guy 2003-04-25 07:47:36 UTC
Thanx for pointing out bug # 19845. It was helpful.

FWIW - It appears in the kernel config for 2.5.68 under:

File systems
    Pseudo file systems
       /dev/pts

is already configured "Y" by default.

The only change required was to add the new line as indicated in the referenced bug to the fstab file.


Two questions:

1) Does this mean we can do without devfs entirely? Or is it still required by Gentoo for something else? If not, I'd just as soon stop including it in my 2.5.68+ kernel compiles.

2) Is it possible to have a kernel dependent fstab sub file? I know in /etc/module.autoload.d/ there are both kerne.2.4 and kernel.2.5 files. And it is helpful in my multi-boot environment to take advantage of that. With my limited knowledge of fstab and mtab, I don't see how it would be possible to do something like this for fstab. But I figured I's ask anyway.  :-)
Comment 3 Guy 2003-04-26 13:35:03 UTC
Problem number 1) is apparently also related to the 'pts' issue.

Adding the line in the fstab file resolved this issue as well.

Bug can be closed - but, as pointed out in bug # 19845, the user documentation should be updated appropriately.

:-)
Comment 4 Jay Pfeifer (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2003-05-04 13:41:45 UTC
closing as per user.