Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 197874 - www-client/pybugz-0.7.1 is missing bugs 0.7.0 found
Summary: www-client/pybugz-0.7.1 is missing bugs 0.7.0 found
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Current packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: High normal (vote)
Assignee: William Hubbs
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
: 197774 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2007-11-02 13:25 UTC by Wulf Krueger (RETIRED)
Modified: 2007-11-25 17:03 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments
very simple patch fixing issue (pybugz_firstline.patch,340 bytes, patch)
2007-11-22 23:51 UTC, René 'Necoro' Neumann
Details | Diff

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Wulf Krueger (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2007-11-02 13:25:51 UTC
With 0.7.0 "bugz search kmplayer" finds bug 197731 in b.g.o. The same query with 0.7.1 returns nothing. I've observed the same problem for many other bugs as well.
Comment 1 René 'Necoro' Neumann 2007-11-22 23:45:19 UTC
I have not tested pybugz-0.7.0 - but I observed strange searching behavior too:

necoro@Devoty ~ % bugz search lazy --status=ALL | grep liblazy
 175549 bug-wranglers        when emerging liblazy I get a diffing md5 checksum
 182847 genstef              sys-libs/liblazy-0.1 Digest verification failed

necoro@Devoty ~ % bugz search liblazy --status=ALL | grep liblazy
 * Searching for 'liblazy' with the following options:
 182847 genstef              sys-libs/liblazy-0.1 Digest verification failed


Obviously - they should return the same bugs.
Comment 2 René 'Necoro' Neumann 2007-11-22 23:51:11 UTC
Created attachment 136726 [details, diff]
very simple patch fixing issue

And here is a very simple patch in case nobody else had the idea ^^. It correlates with bug #197774 .

With the line "for row in rows[1:]" the CSV header line is already stripped, and there should be now use in stripping the first result too :)
Comment 3 William Hubbs gentoo-dev 2007-11-25 16:48:11 UTC
*** Bug 197774 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 4 William Hubbs gentoo-dev 2007-11-25 17:03:30 UTC
This is fixed in svn.

Thanks for the patch. :-)