Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 197024 - stable x11-apps/xdm-1.1.4 still installs /etc/pam.d/xdm incuding pam_stack.so
Summary: stable x11-apps/xdm-1.1.4 still installs /etc/pam.d/xdm incuding pam_stack.so
Status: RESOLVED NEEDINFO
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: New packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: High normal (vote)
Assignee: Gentoo X packagers
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
: 197026 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2007-10-25 12:48 UTC by Carsten Lohrke (RETIRED)
Modified: 2007-10-27 13:46 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Carsten Lohrke (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2007-10-25 12:48:43 UTC 
see summary
Comment 1 Diego Elio Pettenò (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2007-10-25 12:53:19 UTC 
Err no, it doesn't. It did, but it doesn't. The old xdm ebuilds used to install pam_stack.so-based pamd files, but now installs a proper pamd file. It depends on when you installed.
Comment 2 Carsten Lohrke (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2007-10-25 12:58:15 UTC 
I just reinstalled 1.1.4 before I filed the bug and synced the tree this morning...
Comment 3 Carsten Lohrke (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2007-10-25 13:23:03 UTC 
Hm - .../image/etc/pam.d/xdm gets written correctly, but apparently not merged, while Portage claims to do so. Weird. Same problem with dev-libs/cyrus-sasl. Anyone having an idea? Portage bug!?
Comment 4 Carsten Lohrke (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2007-10-25 13:23:33 UTC 
*** Bug 197026 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 5 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2007-10-25 15:27:54 UTC 
(In reply to comment #3)
> Hm - .../image/etc/pam.d/xdm gets written correctly, but apparently not merged,
> while Portage claims to do so. Weird. Same problem with dev-libs/cyrus-sasl.
> Anyone having an idea? Portage bug!?

Maybe if you could post some emerge output...