Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 194427 - net-www/netscape-flash-9.0.60.0_beta100107 version bump
Summary: net-www/netscape-flash-9.0.60.0_beta100107 version bump
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: New packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: Lowest enhancement (vote)
Assignee: Jim Ramsay (lack) (RETIRED)
URL: http://labs.adobe.com/technologies/fl...
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2007-10-01 18:54 UTC by jon R-B
Modified: 2007-11-07 12:31 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---

Attachments
netscape-flash-100107.ebuild (netscape-flash-100107.ebuild,1.63 KB, text/plain)
2007-10-01 18:55 UTC, jon R-B 		Details
View All Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description jon R-B 2007-10-01 18:54:29 UTC 
New release of the flash plugin
Adobe has provided version number for the tarball (woohoo) by the release date

ebuild attached (basically a slightly tweaked version of the prev ebuild)

Reproducible: Always
Comment 1 jon R-B 2007-10-01 18:55:00 UTC 
Created attachment 132332 [details]
netscape-flash-100107.ebuild

works fine this end (amd64)
Comment 2 Jon 2007-10-01 22:17:45 UTC 
It should be noted that this is a Release Candidate, but it should be made final in a short time if no bugs are reported to Adobe.
Comment 3 Jim Ramsay (lack) (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2007-10-02 19:37:37 UTC 
Well, there's no way I'm going to call this "netscape-flash-100107.ebuild", but I'll be checking in "netscape-flash-9.0.60.0_beta100107.ebuild in the near future.

I have had no problems with it either, thus far (5 minutes of testing total), so it is not yet p.masked at this time.
Comment 4 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2007-10-03 06:34:43 UTC 
*netscape-flash-9.0.60.0_beta100107 (02 Oct 2007)

  02 Oct 2007; Jim Ramsay <lack@gentoo.org>
  +netscape-flash-9.0.60.0_beta100107.ebuild:
  New beta version released (Bug 194427)
Comment 5 Kevin Funk 2007-11-07 12:31:32 UTC 
Just one question: Why do you format it "netscape-flash-MMDDYY"? Emerge and derivates will mess up the release order. "netscape-flash-YYYYMMDD" would be the correct syntax.