Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 190982 - move sys-process/{minit,runit} and app-admin/jinit to sys-aps
Summary: move sys-process/{minit,runit} and app-admin/jinit to sys-aps
Status: RESOLVED WONTFIX
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: New packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: Lowest enhancement
Assignee: Gentoo's Team for Core System packages
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
: 216461 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2007-09-01 17:51 UTC by Daniel Pielmeier
Modified: 2009-10-12 15:59 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Daniel Pielmeier gentoo-dev 2007-09-01 17:51:59 UTC
There are many sysinit replacements in the tree. I found at least seven including sysvinit. They are in three different categories. Shouldn't they be united in one category? Or has this special reasons?

app-admin/firstboot not sure if this is an init system
app-admin/jinit
sys-apps/cinit
sys-apps/einit
sys-apps/initng and sys-apps/initng-ifiles
sys-apps/sysvinit
sys-process/minit
sys-process/runit

Also a few of them need a version bump.
Latest cinit in portage is 0.08 latest development release is 0.3pre11 and latest stable is 0.2.1.
Latest einit in portage is 0.22.0 latest release is 0.24.3
Latest runit in portage is 1,70 latest release is 1.7.2

Regards,

Daniel
Comment 1 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2007-09-01 18:01:53 UTC
Please, take the version bumps to separate bugs, thanks.
Comment 2 Diego Elio Pettenò (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2009-08-09 17:50:03 UTC
Given that minit _was_ in sys-apps, and that sys-process should probably be the correct category for all of them, the bug is at least misfiled.

On the other hand, since package moves are frowned upon if there are no very good reasons for them, for now, let's just drop this.
Comment 3 SpanKY gentoo-dev 2009-10-12 15:59:43 UTC
*** Bug 216461 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***