Needs to wait for bug 187617 first but after that let's get these stable: betelgeuse@pena /usr/portage/dev-java/jruby $ adjutrix -w x86 =dev-java/jruby-1.0.0 Package Version Current Keywords Masks ============================= =================== ================= ========= dev-ruby/rspec 1.0.5 ~x86 dev-java/asm 2.2.3-r1 ~x86 dev-java/jruby 1.0.0 ~x86
nichoj: I doubt bug 181856 and bug 184375 are regressions over the current stable. Please prove me wrong.
I've never used the stable version, so I can't speak on if its a regression or not. That being said, using gem and being able to run rails are important features. Marking the 1.0 stable without them working would be not be fair to our stable users. Not having them working in testing is also not fair for our testing users, but that's my fault and responsibility.
(In reply to comment #2) > I've never used the stable version, so I can't speak on if its a regression or > not. > Arch teams: Please don't mark 1.0.0 stable unless you have tested that the dependency bugs also happen in current stable. If not sure, please don't mark it.
Maybe I didn't speak strongly enough, but I don't think it's a good idea to mark stable with such glaring bugs, regardless of if they are regressions or not.
(In reply to comment #4) > Maybe I didn't speak strongly enough, but I don't think it's a good idea to > mark stable with such glaring bugs, regardless of if they are regressions or > not. > well then we should think about removing stable keywords altogether
(In reply to comment #5) > (In reply to comment #4) > > Maybe I didn't speak strongly enough, but I don't think it's a good idea to > > mark stable with such glaring bugs, regardless of if they are regressions or > > not. > well then we should think about removing stable keywords altogether Yes, please.
Stable keywords dropped. Closing.
