Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 18679 - New Ebuild; app-sci/clustalw-1.83.ebuld
Summary: New Ebuild; app-sci/clustalw-1.83.ebuld
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: New packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: High enhancement
Assignee: Michael Imhof (RETIRED)
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2003-04-03 04:04 UTC by Gontran Zepeda
Modified: 2003-04-05 07:46 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments
clustalw-1.83.ebuild (clustalw-1.83.ebuild,983 bytes, patch)
2003-04-03 04:05 UTC, Gontran Zepeda
Details | Diff
files/optimize-clustalw1.83.patch (optimize-clustalw1.83.patch,327 bytes, patch)
2003-04-03 04:06 UTC, Gontran Zepeda
Details | Diff
distribution terms (CLUSTALW,640 bytes, text/plain)
2003-04-04 03:09 UTC, Gontran Zepeda
Details

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Gontran Zepeda 2003-04-03 04:04:16 UTC
Multiple alignment is a crucial aspect of biological sequence analysis. 
Clustalw was the first widely used tool for this task, and continues to be of
use today.

DESCRIPTION="Improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignmen
t through sequence weighting, position specific gap penalties and weight matrix 
choice."

HOMEPAGE="http://www.embl-heidelberg.de/~seqanal/"
Comment 1 Gontran Zepeda 2003-04-03 04:05:40 UTC
Created attachment 10145 [details, diff]
clustalw-1.83.ebuild

new ebuild
Comment 2 Gontran Zepeda 2003-04-03 04:06:33 UTC
Created attachment 10146 [details, diff]
files/optimize-clustalw1.83.patch

for the files dir.
Comment 3 Gontran Zepeda 2003-04-03 04:08:56 UTC
Package is NOT x86 only, contrary to my KEYWORDS assertion.
Comment 4 Michael Imhof (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2003-04-03 12:38:05 UTC
Ok, i checked in the ebuild to app-sci/clustalw.
I added a license file: licenses/clustalw and edited the ebuild to point to it.
I hope the section i included there actually IS the license. Please correct me if I'm wrong.
I masked the ebuild for all archs. Please have a look and tell me if everything is ok, so I can unmask it.
Comment 5 Gontran Zepeda 2003-04-04 03:08:34 UTC
Your changes look real good.  Thanks for the suggestion of license addition.  You're more privy to the practice for licensing:  tell me, is it fair to reference the license that's in the README in lieu of adding YAL (yet another license) to the /usr/portage/license directory?  In the case that it's <i>not</i>, I'll append the only obvious reference to licensing that I found in the README, as an attachment.
Comment 6 Gontran Zepeda 2003-04-04 03:09:23 UTC
Created attachment 10184 [details]
distribution terms

possible license candidate file
Comment 7 Michael Imhof (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2003-04-05 07:46:07 UTC
Ok, changed the license according to your attachement.
I think it's the normal process to add licenses to licenses.
I unmasked it for x86.
Closing this bug now.

Thanks for your help!