Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 18642 - ebuilds for inti and inti-gconf
Summary: ebuilds for inti and inti-gconf
Status: RESOLVED LATER
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: New packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: x86 Linux
: Low enhancement
Assignee: Gentoo Linux Gnome Desktop Team
URL: http://inti.sourceforge.net/
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2003-04-02 10:34 UTC by Darko Obradovic
Modified: 2003-06-08 16:05 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments
the ebuild for inti (inti-1.0.7.ebuild,624 bytes, text/plain)
2003-04-02 10:35 UTC, Darko Obradovic
Details
the ebuild for inti-gconf (inti-gconf-1.0.4.ebuild,564 bytes, text/plain)
2003-04-02 10:36 UTC, Darko Obradovic
Details

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Darko Obradovic 2003-04-02 10:34:29 UTC
inti is a C++-binding for GTK2, similar to gtkmm, but somewhat different as
well. :) It's quite hot, released stable as of today, but it had quite some
betas before.

The ebuilds work fine on my computer, they were initially created with ebuilder.
There might be some an issue to resolve: You can install a lighter/faster
package without debugging-support, which is only interesting for developers of
course.
Same goes for the documentation, which could be handled by the doc-USE-variable,
or being split into another "inti-doc"-package.

Any feedback is welcome.

Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.
Comment 1 Darko Obradovic 2003-04-02 10:35:50 UTC
Created attachment 10127 [details]
the ebuild for inti
Comment 2 Darko Obradovic 2003-04-02 10:36:44 UTC
Created attachment 10128 [details]
the ebuild for inti-gconf
Comment 3 Darko Obradovic 2003-04-27 12:31:40 UTC
This one takes a long time too... :)

Two more additions:
- inti-gconf experienced a minor bugfix-update to version 1.0.5, no changes for the ebuild.
- then it would be best to install both packages using "make install-strip", but I'm not sure how to implement this.

And I should have better made them "~x86" I guess... but you will adapt Keywords anyways. :)
Comment 4 Alastair Tse (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2003-04-27 17:34:19 UTC
i'm not too familiar with this, but is there anything that actually uses the inti bindings? 

there are the gtkmm/libgnomemm bindings in portage now and an actual app(let) that uses it. i thought these were similar. the thing is unless there is a specific application that can take advantage of it, i don't have much motivation to maintain yet another c++ binding for gtk :(
Comment 5 Darko Obradovic 2003-04-28 02:28:45 UTC
As far as I know, there's no released application yet. But the approach is somewhat different compared to gtkmm, and it perfectly suits private academic projects and maybe developers.
I don't really expect frequent updates, as it's quite complete and solid by now. Your decision. :)
Comment 6 Alastair Tse (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2003-06-08 16:05:11 UTC
unfortunately, its quite an effort to maintain libraries which aren't used by any applications. maybe in the future some useful application might appear that uses this.

in the meantime, i'll have to close this.