While looking through the vimrc located in /etc/vim/ I noticed that every bug mentioned within has since been resolved. Those would be bugs: #14088 #73715 #122562 #101665 #101819 Does that mean that those portions of the vimrc file should be removed? Or are they still included as say a precautionary measure?
(In reply to comment #0) > Does that mean that those portions of the vimrc file should be removed? Or are > they still included as say a precautionary measure? Hmmm? Why they should be removed? That's how the bugs were fixed, they can't be removed.
(In reply to comment #1) > (In reply to comment #0) > > Does that mean that those portions of the vimrc file should be removed? Or are > > they still included as say a precautionary measure? > > Hmmm? Why they should be removed? That's how the bugs were fixed, they can't be > removed. > Then I have misunderstood. I am sorry.