Bug 184882 – dev-libs/apr-0.9.14 version bump

• Status: RESOLVED WONTFIX
• Product: Gentoo Linux

[Description Elias Pipping (RETIRED) 2007-07-10 17:59:15 UTC]

Announcement: http://www.apache.org/dist/apr/Announcement0.9.html
Changes: http://www.apache.org/dist/apr/CHANGES-APR-0.9

[Comment 1 Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis (RETIRED) 2007-07-10 22:54:41 UTC]

There's also APR 1.2.9 version bump.

[Comment 2 Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis (RETIRED) 2007-07-21 13:43:05 UTC]

What's the status here?

Announcement: http://www.apache.org/dist/apr/Announcement1.2.html
Changes: http://www.apache.org/dist/apr/CHANGES-APR-1.2

[Comment 3 Benedikt Böhm (RETIRED) 2007-07-30 18:10:26 UTC]

apr-0 will die as soon as apache-2.2 is stable.

[Comment 4 Elias Pipping (RETIRED) 2007-07-30 18:19:36 UTC]

That's unfortunate because until recently, apr-1 didn't work in gentoo/alt (on darwin at least), hence apr-0 was the only way to get subversion.

[Comment 5 Benedikt Böhm (RETIRED) 2007-07-30 18:49:42 UTC]

(In reply to comment #4)
> That's unfortunate because _until recently_, apr-1 didn't work in gentoo/alt (on
> darwin at least), hence apr-0 _was_ the only way to get subversion.

so, it works now?

[Comment 6 Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis (RETIRED) 2007-07-30 20:31:29 UTC]

And what with APR 1.2.9? Should I open a new bug report?

[Comment 7 Elias Pipping (RETIRED) 2007-07-30 21:38:31 UTC]

(In reply to comment #5)
> so, it works now?
> 

Yes, it works now.

[Comment 8 Benedikt Böhm (RETIRED) 2007-07-30 21:43:05 UTC]

in cvs now

[Comment 9 Benedikt Böhm (RETIRED) 2007-07-30 21:43:49 UTC]

last comment regarding apr-1.2.9

(In reply to comment #7)
> (In reply to comment #5)
> > so, it works now?
> > 
> 
> Yes, it works now.
> 

ok, great, we can get rid of apr-0 then :)