Bug 181789 – dev-db/qt-unixODBC-3.3.8: Ignored CFLAGS and LDFLAGS: /usr/qt/3/plugins/sqldrivers/libqsqlodbc.so

• Status: RESOLVED FIXED
• Product: Gentoo Linux

[Description Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis (RETIRED) 2007-06-12 16:44:47 UTC]

CFLAGS are ignored.

### List of files built with LDFLAGS ignored ###
/usr/qt/3/plugins/sqldrivers/libqsqlodbc.so
### End of list                              ###

Probably similar sedding like this in x11-libs/qt is needed.

[Comment 1 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) 2007-06-12 17:48:21 UTC]

OK, that was about enough.

1/ Use common sense when filing bugs (like, what about mailing gentoo-dev mailing list first and asking about the best course of action here?
2/ If you have a patch, submit it *upstream* unless this is a *Gentoo-specific* issue.

[Comment 2 Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis (RETIRED) 2007-06-12 18:30:11 UTC]

This bug report also concerns CFLAGS. Unfortunately you didn't see it.
http://devmanual.gentoo.org/ebuild-writing/functions/src_compile/building/index.html
and http://devmanual.gentoo.org/general-concepts/user-environment/index.html
say that CFLAGS should be respected.

I have patch so I'm reopening it.

[Comment 3 Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis (RETIRED) 2007-06-12 18:31:33 UTC]

Created attachment 121838 [details, diff]
Patch

Solution is copied from x11-libs/qt.

[Comment 4 Piotr Jaroszyński (RETIRED) 2007-06-28 14:11:41 UTC]

Qt: I would love to see a comment from you.

[Comment 5 Mark Loeser (RETIRED) 2008-03-27 02:26:31 UTC]

I'm not comfortable with applying this unless someone from the qt team comments.  Has anyone tried this out and made sure it works fine, and can get upstream to have a nicer solution for us? :)

[Comment 6 Bo Ørsted Andresen (RETIRED) 2008-03-27 08:00:53 UTC]

It's obviously the right solution, given how it's the same tarball as qt itself from which the suggested solution was grabbed. Fixed in 3.3.8.