Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 181101 - sci-chemistry/chimera ebuild request
Summary: sci-chemistry/chimera ebuild request
Status: RESOLVED WONTFIX
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: New packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: High enhancement (vote)
Assignee: Default Assignee for New Packages
URL: http://www.rbvi.ucsf.edu/chimera/
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2007-06-06 16:33 UTC by Renato Alves
Modified: 2011-02-01 14:50 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Renato Alves 2007-06-06 16:33:39 UTC
UCSF Chimera is a highly extensible, interactive molecular visualization and analysis system.

Licence info:
http://www.rbvi.ucsf.edu/chimera/docs/licensing.html

Proposition for science herd/overlay.

Binary packages are usually more up to date than sources.
Binary packages available for: macosx linux32 linux64 sgi-irix hp-tru64

Reproducible: Always
Comment 1 Jeffrey Gardner (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2007-06-06 19:53:24 UTC
I don't think their license is compatible with our interests.
As nice as chimera is, I for one will never add this package.
If anyone disagrees feel free to reopen :)
Comment 2 Markus Dittrich (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2007-06-07 03:24:54 UTC
Hi Jeffrey,

Just curious: Could you elaborate some on what exactly
bothers you with their license? The licenses for GAMESS
or blas-got for example are also pretty restrictive but
I might have missed the crucial bit, of course.

Thanks,
Markus
Comment 3 Jeffrey Gardner (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2007-06-07 04:26:00 UTC
I could be way off-base in my interpretation of the various licences, but let's pretend for a moment that someone, someday, may want to patent or commercialize something that I've worked on using chimera. Their licence requirements specifically forbid that sort of thing, while the licenses of Jmol or rasmol or pymol are more permissive. VMD's definition of "commercial use" seems like they don't want anyone repackaging their software and selling it. Chimera on the other hand expressly defines non-commercial use as "academic or other scholarly research which...is not intended to produce works, services, or data for commercial use". To me, it's clear that I'm safe using *mol and VMD, and I should steer clear of chimera.
Comment 4 Markus Dittrich (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2007-06-07 12:37:45 UTC
Thanks for the clarification; I'll have to look at the license
again in detail later. 

cheers,
Markus 
Comment 5 Juergen Rose 2011-02-01 14:50:36 UTC
Almost four years later, has anything changed with the assessment of the license situation of chimera. I just got a recommendation for chimera. It should be much better than pymol.