Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 180757 - net-libs/zapata removal (was: does not build PIC code)
Summary: net-libs/zapata removal (was: does not build PIC code)
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: New packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: High normal (vote)
Assignee: Gentoo TreeCleaner Project
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2007-06-03 16:04 UTC by Andy
Modified: 2009-05-13 03:59 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments
amd64 patch (amd64.patch,285 bytes, patch)
2007-06-03 16:05 UTC, Andy
Details | Diff

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Andy 2007-06-03 16:04:56 UTC
zapata appears to not compile on amd64 because of simple CFLAGS issues.  I got it to compile with a simple patch to the makefile, although I have not yet tested the compiled library.

I don't know enough about ebuilds to make the needed modifications to the zapata ebuild to use this patch.

Reproducible: Always
Comment 1 Andy 2007-06-03 16:05:36 UTC
Created attachment 121047 [details, diff]
amd64 patch
Comment 2 Łukasz Damentko (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2008-08-11 00:37:30 UTC
Reassigning back to herd since Stefan has been retired as a Gentoo Developer (#27693).
Comment 3 Santiago M. Mola (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2008-09-17 11:42:32 UTC
Is this really used? I can't find updated info in asterisk.org, and http://www.zapatatelephony.org/ points to asterisk.org ftp addresses which doesn't exist anymore. Furthermore, this lib doesn't have reverse dependencies in Portage.

I'm reluctant to fix and keyword a package that is dead.
Comment 4 Jeremy Olexa (darkside) (RETIRED) archtester gentoo-dev Security 2008-12-08 02:27:46 UTC
(In reply to comment #3)

> I'm reluctant to fix and keyword a package that is dead.

Add us back to CC after patch has been applied, if desired. Seems like a dead project to me.
Comment 5 Jeremy Olexa (darkside) (RETIRED) archtester gentoo-dev Security 2008-12-08 02:33:48 UTC
(sorry, didn't mean to close)
Comment 6 Diego Elio Pettenò (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2009-03-05 10:10:35 UTC
I sincerely think this is a messed up package. The amd64 patch actually fixes a generic QA problem (code not being PIC and generating TEXTRELs under x86 too).

Also, it seems to force extra cflags in the build, and since everybody seems to agree that it's a dead project, I think it would be a good candidate for deletion.

voip herd has to make the call, though I'd sincerely suggest it from the QA point of view.
Comment 7 Mounir Lamouri (volkmar) (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2009-04-08 22:14:01 UTC
It's indeed a good candidate for removal.

This lib is an interface for zaptel. It was used by asterisk a long ago but it is now longer used by asterisk nor maintained by digium.

So, except if someone has good reasons, it's going to be removed.
Comment 8 Jeremy Olexa (darkside) (RETIRED) archtester gentoo-dev Security 2009-05-13 03:59:22 UTC
removed, fixed