Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 180360 - stable request sys-apps/slocate-3.1-r1
Summary: stable request sys-apps/slocate-3.1-r1
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: New packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: High enhancement (vote)
Assignee: Gentoo's Team for Core System packages
URL: http://slocate.trakker.ca/
Whiteboard:
Keywords: STABLEREQ
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2007-05-30 16:40 UTC by impulze
Modified: 2008-03-16 08:53 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description impulze 2007-05-30 16:40:29 UTC
Is it possible to get sys-apps/slocate-3.1-r1 stable? it seems to be in the tree without a change for quite some time now according to http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/sys-apps/slocate

Reproducible: Always

Steps to Reproduce:
Comment 1 Paolo Pedroni 2007-10-03 10:24:11 UTC
There is at least one open bug against slocate-3.1 (#133053), which, by the way has not seen any action since December 2006 (!!!). Personally I've been using slocate-3.1 for ages without problems, but marking packages with open bugs stable is against policy.
Comment 2 SpanKY gentoo-dev 2007-10-03 12:57:38 UTC
no it isnt
Comment 3 Paolo Pedroni 2007-10-03 13:49:18 UTC
Quoting from the ebuild policy (http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/devrel/handbook/handbook.xml?part=3&chap=1):

"Moving package versions from ~ARCH to ARCH
 When a package version has proved stable for sufficient time and the Gentoo maintainer of the package is confident that the upgrade will not break a regular Gentoo user's machine, then it can be moved from ~ARCH to ARCH. An indication of the package's stability would be no verified or unresolved bug report for a month after the version's introduction."

It's not exactly what I said, but close enough IMHO. Care to explain the difference? I'm sincerely curious.
Comment 4 SpanKY gentoo-dev 2007-10-04 04:46:19 UTC
the policy is not hard, it's left up to maintainers to decide what's best.  thus your statement that "marking packages with open bugs stable is against policy" is clearly incorrect.
Comment 5 Dawid Węgliński (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2008-02-04 18:04:48 UTC
x86 stable
Comment 6 Jeroen Roovers (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2008-02-04 20:38:23 UTC
Stable for HPPA.
Comment 7 Brent Baude (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2008-02-06 02:06:12 UTC
ppc64 stable
Comment 8 Ferris McCormick (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2008-02-06 14:05:14 UTC
Sparc stable.  The ewarn about rebuilding the database really means it; after you do that, everything works as usual.
Comment 9 Christoph Mende (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2008-02-06 14:30:46 UTC
amd64 stable
Comment 10 Raúl Porcel (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2008-02-06 14:35:07 UTC
alpha/ia64 stable
Comment 11 nixnut (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2008-02-06 18:03:32 UTC
ppc stable
Comment 12 Christian Faulhammer (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2008-03-16 08:53:29 UTC
All done by Mike, closing