sci-biology/tree-puzzle :0 5.1 -> nothing on default-linux/ppc/ppc32/2006.1 (unstable) 5.1 -> nothing on default-linux/ppc/ppc32/2007.0 (unstable) 5.1 -> nothing on default-linux/ppc/ppc32/2007.0/desktop (unstable) 5.1 -> nothing on default-linux/ppc/ppc32/2007.0/G3 (unstable) 5.1 -> nothing on default-linux/ppc/ppc32/2007.0/G3/Pegasos (unstable) 5.1 -> nothing on default-linux/ppc/ppc32/2007.0/G4 (unstable) 5.1 -> nothing on default-linux/ppc/ppc32/2007.0/G4/Pegasos (unstable) 5.1 -> nothing on default-linux/ppc/ppc32/2007.0/desktop/G3 (unstable) 5.1 -> nothing on default-linux/ppc/ppc32/2007.0/desktop/G3/Pegasos (unstable) 5.1 -> nothing on default-linux/ppc/ppc32/2007.0/desktop/G4 (unstable) 5.1 -> nothing on default-linux/ppc/ppc32/2007.0/desktop/G4/Pegasos (unstable) 5.1 -> nothing on default-linux/ppc/ppc64/2007.0/32bit-userland (unstable) 5.1 -> nothing on default-darwin/macos/10.4 (stable) 5.1 -> nothing on hardened/ppc (unstable) 5.1 -> nothing on selinux/ppc/ppc32/2006.1/G3 (unstable) 5.1 -> nothing on selinux/ppc/ppc32/2006.1/G4 (unstable) Apparent cause: 21 May 2007; Olivier Fisette <ribosome@gentoo.org> -tree-puzzle-5.1.ebuild: Pruned old version. 5.1 was the last ~ppc version.
This is indeed my mistake, and I have no clue as to why ppc was dropped when I added version 5.2. I suggest marking version 5.2 ~ppc rather than bringing back version 5.1. To test Tree-Puzzle, start an interactive session with "puzzle -randseed=1". Choose /usr/share/tree-puzzle/data/atp6.a as the input file. Do not change any option; use defaults. The analysis should be very fast. 3 output files will be created in the working directory. Compare these with the attached reference results. The only differences should be timestamps and computation times.
Created attachment 120322 [details] outdist
Created attachment 120323 [details] outfile
Created attachment 120325 [details] outtree
It fails its own tests: ===================== 14 of 17 tests failed ===================== Your interactive test checks out fine though.
(In reply to comment #5) > It fails its own tests: > ===================== > 14 of 17 tests failed > ===================== > > Your interactive test checks out fine though. > I would have been surprised if it had worked. ;-) The test suite is broken as it uses diff to compare results where round-up errors are likely. I think the test I provided is enough, but if you want to use the upstream-provided tests, I am afraid you will have to manually check the output of "make check"...
Good enough for me. ~ppc keyword added.
