Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 176966 (BloodyIron) - menuconfig alphabetical listing
Summary: menuconfig alphabetical listing
Status: RESOLVED UPSTREAM
Alias: BloodyIron
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: [OLD] Core system (show other bugs)
Hardware: x86 Linux
: Lowest enhancement (vote)
Assignee: Gentoo Linux bug wranglers
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2007-05-03 22:23 UTC by Stanly Ibkis
Modified: 2007-05-04 06:20 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Stanly Ibkis 2007-05-03 22:23:51 UTC
Hey guys, I am not sure if I should be forwarding this to you or to kernel.org, but since it is gentoo-sources I am dealing with, I figured this might be the appropriate way to go. Either way, I have recently been trying to setup my sound to work in linux, and unfortunately due to the way the listing is laid out I think I have selected the wrong driver for a simple error. The driver listing under PCI Sound devices under ALSA is not listed alphabetically. I do not know what other sections are not listed alphabetically, but this surely is a pain. I propose that all the listings be done alphabetically, perhaps not the main menu, but some sort of order. It certainly helps going through driver listings alphabetically, as I found having two sections for intel drivers for sound to be rather irritating and has caused me to recompile my kernel now a third time (to be done). Either way, I would appreciate it if the listings were arranged alphabetically in the menu for selecting what to be compiled into the kernel.

As I said before, I am not certain if this is your department, if it is not, please let me know who to mention this to and I gladly will. Either way, much appreciated help if you can provide. :)
Comment 1 James 2007-05-03 23:27:56 UTC
Tristan,

This is something that has to be decided upstream (the kernel devs).  The Gentoo Kernel devs are generally not in the business of making changes like this; in fact, it's the g.o kernel dev's policy that patches not be created that deviate largely from the main kernel tree.

There's a good explanation as to why the g.o kernel devs don't deviate from the mainline kernel here:

http://dev.gentoo.org/~dsd/genpatches/faq.htm

"Q. Will you apply [some kernel patch]?
If it's a serious and non-intrusive bugfix that has been accepted into the upstream development kernel, then usually yes (please open a bug). Otherwise, generally the answer is no - instead of getting new features added to our kernel, we'd prefer you to contact the authors of that code and get them to finish off their work and submit it to the mainline kernel so that everyone can benefit."

Hope this helps!  :)
Comment 2 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2007-05-04 06:20:22 UTC
Indeed, this is not something for Gentoo to change.

http://lkml.org/
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/