Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 17686 - fonts.conf not optimal ?
Summary: fonts.conf not optimal ?
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: [OLD] Library (show other bugs)
Hardware: x86 Linux
: High minor (vote)
Assignee: Martin Schlemmer (RETIRED)
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2003-03-17 08:56 UTC by Frido Ferdinand
Modified: 2003-04-06 11:21 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments
fonts.conf from mozilla redhat configuration (fonts.conf,7.00 KB, application/octet-stream)
2003-03-17 08:57 UTC, Frido Ferdinand
Details

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Frido Ferdinand 2003-03-17 08:56:03 UTC
after emerging the new xfree 4.3.0-r1 i noticed that my fonts.conf got
overwritten. i remembered that i had indeed copied a fonts.conf from a redhat
configuration. however i also noticed that the default fonts.conf has worse font
rendering especially in mozilla/galeon. could someone confirm that the attached
fonts.conf is indeed giving them better results ?

Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. use defaults font.conf
2. check results in galeon/mozilla
3. use supplied fonts.conf
4. check results
Comment 1 Frido Ferdinand 2003-03-17 08:57:25 UTC
Created attachment 9514 [details]
fonts.conf from mozilla redhat configuration
Comment 2 Seth Chandler 2003-04-05 06:48:49 UTC
i'm some sort of font freak, so i'm going to take a look here =) 
 
 
seth 
Comment 3 Seth Chandler 2003-04-05 08:19:17 UTC
this isn't an issue with fonts.conf, its an issue with the fonts we actually have installed....

right now i'm running the gentoo fonts.conf and i have fonts just like in redhat....what they have that we don't are the URW-Fonts package.  it provides free/gpl'd postscript fonts that are dead sexy.  

redhat appears to be on the top of their game with this one, so i suggest we simply rpm2targz their src.rpm and build it like they do...

i suggest installing the fonts into /usr/share/fonts/default/Type1...becuase its not a standard collection of X fonts, i believe that is also already in the xfs path, but i'm not sure...

you have no idea the difference installing these fonts makes =)
Comment 4 Martin Schlemmer (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2003-04-05 08:25:42 UTC
Where do they install it, curiosity sake?  The path you suggest should be ok.

Cant we just upload the .tar.bz2 to ibiblio ?  It should minimise the need
to keep updating SRC_URI ...

Comment 5 Martin Schlemmer (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2003-04-05 08:29:19 UTC
Actually, have a look here:

  http://www.gimp.org/fonts.html

With the fonts here:

  http://www.gimp.org/urw-fonts.tar.gz
Comment 6 Seth Chandler 2003-04-05 08:33:14 UTC
i did, the redhat src.rpm is actually more up to date, with better hinting... 
 
thats like the 'first edition'...there is already a 2.0 somewhere 
 
seth 
Comment 7 Seth Chandler 2003-04-05 11:58:39 UTC
emerge x11-misc/urw-fonts 
 
i checked em in, all you have to do is emerge it and things should look kickass by 
default...might have to change the /etc/x11/fs/config if you use xfs, or add that file to 
your XF86Config 
 
not sure, anyway, pretty nice stuff 
 
seth 
Comment 8 Martin Schlemmer (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2003-04-06 11:21:45 UTC
Thanks Seth, I guess we can close this now.