Hi. I created minimal ebuilds (app-emacs/ecmascript-mode and app-emacs/javascript-mode) for editing javascript files in emacs. They will conflict together so that emacs could decide which major-mode to load, but I don't know this is a good way... Please tell me if there is something wrong with them because I am newbie. Thanks. Reproducible: Always
Created attachment 117076 [details] ecmascript-mode-1.1.ebuild
Created attachment 117078 [details] 50ecmascript-mode-gentoo.el
Created attachment 117080 [details] javascript-mode-1.12.ebuild A version of this package is correctly 1.1-2. But a hyphen within the version is not accepted, so I omitted the hyphen...
Created attachment 117082 [details] 50javascript-mode-gentoo.el
You will need to make sure some kind of emacs is installed. Like with DEPEND="virtual/emacs" or DEPEND="app-editors/xemacs".
I did not write DEPEND="virtual/emacs" consciously because I found a same code in /usr/portage/eclass/elisp.class.
(In reply to comment #5) > You will need to make sure some kind of emacs is installed. Like with > DEPEND="virtual/emacs" or DEPEND="app-editors/xemacs". You need not; this is already set by elisp.eclass.
(In reply to comment #3) > A version of this package is correctly 1.1-2. But a hyphen within the version > is not accepted, so I omitted the hyphen... You should do something like the following here: inherit versionator MY_PV=$(replace_version_separator 2 '-') SRC_URI="http://gentoo.panicode.com/distfiles/${PN}-${MY_PV}.tar.gz" And the ebuild should then be named "javascript-mode-1.1.2.ebuild".
(In reply to comment #8) > > A version of this package is correctly 1.1-2. But a hyphen within the > > version is not accepted, so I omitted the hyphen... Sorry, I am confused. The distfile is really named 1.12, but the included elisp file has javascript-mode-version = 1.10. Which one is right? Note that there is also javascript mode by Karl Landström. See discussion at <http://www.emacswiki.org/cgi-bin/wiki/JavaScriptMode>, especially the coloured box at the bottom.
> Sorry, I am confused. The distfile is really named 1.12, but the included elisp > file has javascript-mode-version = 1.10. Which one is right? Sorry, I confused the version about the hyphen with another version of package I created, but thanks to let me know I will fix it before posting :) So, assuming that the author forgot to rewrite the version I decided 1.12 is right from the following link. http://cvs.xemacs.org/viewcvs.cgi/XEmacs/packages/xemacs-packages/prog-modes/javascript-mode.el > Note that there is also javascript mode by Karl Landström. See discussion at > <http://www.emacswiki.org/cgi-bin/wiki/JavaScriptMode>, especially the coloured > box at the bottom. It seems that this javascript-mode is better than both I posted, especially about indentation. I want to create an ebuild for new one like app-emacs/karl-javascript-mode if such the measure is usual. Or I should replace old one with new one?
(In reply to comment #10) > It seems that this javascript-mode is better than both I posted, especially > about indentation. > I want to create an ebuild for new one like app-emacs/karl-javascript-mode if > such the measure is usual. Or I should replace old one with new one? You may just post the ebuild if you wish. We can decide about the name of the package later.
Created attachment 117298 [details] ecmascript-mode-1.1.ebuild
Created attachment 117299 [details] javascript-mode-1.12.ebuild
Created attachment 117300 [details] karl-javascript-mode-2.0_beta8.ebuild
Created attachment 117302 [details] 50karl-javascript-mode-gentoo.el
I posted karl-javascript-mode-2.0_beta8.ebuild and 50karl-javascript-mode-gentoo.el. Please check them.
(In reply to comment #16) > I posted karl-javascript-mode-2.0_beta8.ebuild and > 50karl-javascript-mode-gentoo.el. > > Please check them. Syntax looks O.K. (You could use ${PN} for the SITEFILE, i.e. 50${PN}-gentoo.el but this is not mandatory.) Have you tested it on all architectures that are in KEYWORDS?
(In reply to comment #16) > Please check them. Thumbs up from me, too. Same comments though.
> Syntax looks O.K. (You could use ${PN} for the SITEFILE, i.e. 50${PN}-gentoo.el > but this is not mandatory.) I will fix it. > Have you tested it on all architectures that are in KEYWORDS? I have tested on amd64 only...
(In reply to comment #19) > > Have you tested it on all architectures that are in KEYWORDS? > I have tested on amd64 only... Then please remove all those you have not tested yourself.
Created attachment 117364 [details] ecmascript-mode/ecmascript-mode-1.1.ebuild
Created attachment 117366 [details] javascript-mode-1.12.ebuild
Created attachment 117368 [details] karl-javascript-mode-2.0_beta8.ebuild
I rewrote SITEFILE with ${PN} like SITEFILE="50${PN}-gentoo.el" and removed untested keywords.
Karl Landström's javascript mode is available as package app-emacs/javascript in the Emacs Overlay, see <http://overlays.gentoo.org/proj/emacs/>. (It may take a few hours for the distfile to appear on the Gentoo mirrors.)
(In reply to comment #25) > Karl Landström's javascript mode is available as package app-emacs/javascript > in the Emacs Overlay, see <http://overlays.gentoo.org/proj/emacs/>. Added to CVS, thank you for submitting the ebuild. (Keyworded as ~x86; the ~amd64 keyword will follow soon.)
