Bug 175166 – repoman doesn't like 32-bits userland 2007.0 ppc64 profile

• Status: RESOLVED FIXED
• Product: Gentoo Linux

[Description Alexis Ballier 2007-04-18 22:53:04 UTC]

Hi, 

I'm getting warnings from repoman when I run it in vlc dir or mplayer dir : 
output from repoman full : 

 DEPEND.badindev                4
   media-video/vlc/vlc-0.8.6b_beta1.ebuild: ~ppc64(default-linux/ppc/ppc64/2007.0/32bit-userland) ['dev-libs/DirectFB']


and for mplayer :

  DEPEND.badindev                2
   media-video/mplayer/mplayer-1.0_rc1-r2.ebuild: ppc64(default-linux/ppc/ppc64/2007.0/32bit-userland) ['dev-libs/DirectFB', 'media-tv/linuxtv-dvb-headers']
   media-video/mplayer/mplayer-1.0_rc2_pre20070321-r4.ebuild: ~ppc64(default-linux/ppc/ppc64/2007.0/32bit-userland) ['dev-libs/DirectFB', 'media-tv/linuxtv-dvb-headers']
  RDEPEND.badindev               2
   media-video/mplayer/mplayer-1.0_rc1-r2.ebuild: ppc64(default-linux/ppc/ppc64/2007.0/32bit-userland) ['dev-libs/DirectFB', 'media-tv/linuxtv-dvb-headers']
   media-video/mplayer/mplayer-1.0_rc2_pre20070321-r4.ebuild: ~ppc64(default-linux/ppc/ppc64/2007.0/32bit-userland) ['dev-libs/DirectFB', 'media-tv/linuxtv-dvb-headers']


basically those deps are not keyworded for ppc64 but what I don't understand is why he doesn't scream for older profiles, the difference between 2006.1 and 2007.0 are afaik very small (and nothing changed in the use.mask file...)

So I don't know if that's repoman being too picky, a pebcak or a real dependency problem, I just thought it was worth reporting it.

[Comment 1 Markus Rothe (RETIRED) 2007-04-19 06:28:32 UTC]

thanks. tested DirectFB and added ~ppc64.

[Comment 2 Alexis Ballier 2007-04-19 13:16:18 UTC]

I still get warnings like that for e.g. xine-lib : 
   media-libs/xine-lib/xine-lib-1.1.4-r2.ebuild: ppc64(default-linux/ppc/ppc64/2007.0/32bit-userland) ['>=dev-libs/DirectFB-0.9.9']


isn't 32bit userland supposed to use ppc keyword not ppc64 ?

[Comment 3 Markus Rothe (RETIRED) 2007-04-19 15:21:45 UTC]

ok.. good point.

@others from ppc64: any ideas?

[Comment 4 Markus Rothe (RETIRED) 2007-04-23 06:03:47 UTC]

note:

repoman does not beef about older 32bit profiles (2006.1), because they are commented in profiles.desc and so don't get checked.

[Comment 5 Brent Baude (RETIRED) 2007-04-25 00:54:32 UTC]

Ok, I'm adding dev-portage to this bug.  I chatted with antarus on irc today and it seems like this might be a repoman bug, but could conceivably be a profile bug as well. Note that it does not complain about the 2006.1 32bit userland profile either.

With the 32bit userlands, the keywords are ppc and not ppc64.  But it looks like repoman is complaining about ppc64 keywords for that profile which is not right.

I've asked antarus to help us determine if this is a repoman or a profile issue.  Antarus said he would like to look at this while he's at home.   

Thanks antarus!

[Comment 6 Brent Baude (RETIRED) 2007-04-25 01:13:18 UTC]

I fixed profiles.desc.  This should be ok now.