the ebuild says that glew is GPL-2. However the tarball includes a different license in license.txt and also offers LGPL as an alternative in COPYING.txt
The licensing is derived from http://glew.sourceforge.net/credits.html. And the ebuild states that more licenses than GPL-2 cover the code. I also don't see license.txt or COPYING.txt in the tarball...
Apologies, I got confused. The package in question is actually media-libs/ftgl. Is this something you take care of as well?
That looks like Games/Seemant's shtick.
So is LGPL acceptable or should we list both licenses?
it's lgpl-2 unless you want to work something out with the author. It shouldn't have been gpl-2 though so I changed that in portage.