should have libgda? ( =gnome-extra/libgda-1* )
Fixing libgda/libgnomedb dependencies in the tree is required before unmasking the 3.0 versions, so this will be done when it's appropriate. If you want to help in this regard, you can compile the complete list of packages that need to adjust their dependencies accordingly, and then we could use this bug to track that. Thanks.
app-office/abiword-plugins (2.4.5, 2.4.6): libgda? ( >=gnome-extra/libgda-1.2 >=gnome-extra/libgnomedb-1.2 ) app-office/planner (0.12.1, 0.13, 0.14): libgda? >=gnome-extra/libgda-1.0 dev-cpp/libgdamm (1.3.6, 1.3.7): >=gnome-extra/libgda-1.1.4 dev-dotnet/gda-sharp (1.0.8, 1.0.8-r1, 1.0.10): >=gnome-extra/libgda-1.0.0 dev-dotnet/gnomedb-sharp (1.0.8, 1.0.8-r1, 1.0.10): >=gnome-extra/libgnomedb-1.0.0 dev-python/gnome-python-extras (2.14.0-r1, 2.14.2): >=gnome-extra/libgda-1.2.0 dev-ruby/ruby-libgda (0.10.1, 0.12.0, 0.14.1, 0.15.0):>=gnome-extra/libgda-1.0.3 dev-util/glade (2.6.8): gnomedb? ( >=gnome-extra/libgda-0.90.0 >=gnome-extra/libgnomedb-0.90.3 ) gnome-extra/libgnomedb (1.2.2): >=gnome-extra/libgda-1.1.99 with the versions we have in the tree, all >=gnome-extra/libgda-1.x deps need to become =gnome-extra/libgda-1*, and ditto for gnome-extra/libgnomedb.
done: app-office/abiword-plugins app-office/planner dev-cpp/libgdamm dev-python/gnome-python-extras dev-util/glade gnome-extra/libgnomedb todo: dev-dotnet/gda-sharp dev-dotnet/gnomedb-sharp dev-ruby/ruby-libgda side notes: - gnome-python-extras could probably use a libgda USE flag but I need to double check that first - glade uses a local USE flag (gnomedb) instead of the global USE (libgda) - description of libgda USE flag is not very good and should be revisited. thoughts ?
adding ruby and dotnet herd so they can do their magic.
dev-ruby/ruby-libgda-* done.
dev-dotnet/gda-sharp and dev-dotnet/gnomedb-sharp done. Closing since we're last on the list.