xfce-extra/mousepad :0 0.2.2-r1 -> 0.2.2 on default-linux/alpha/2006.1 (stable) 0.2.2-r1 -> 0.2.2 on default-linux/alpha/2006.1/desktop (stable) 0.2.2-r1 -> 0.2.2 on default-linux/alpha/no-nptl (stable) 0.2.2-r1 -> 0.2.2 on default-linux/alpha/no-nptl/2.4 (stable) 0.2.2-r1 -> 0.2.2 on default-linux/hppa/2006.1 (stable) 0.2.2-r1 -> 0.2.2 on default-linux/ppc/ppc32/2006.1 (stable) 0.2.2-r1 -> 0.2.2 on hardened/ppc (stable) 0.2.2-r1 -> 0.2.2 on selinux/alpha/2006.1 (stable) 0.2.2-r1 -> 0.2.2 on selinux/ppc/ppc32/2006.1/G3 (stable) 0.2.2-r1 -> 0.2.2 on selinux/ppc/ppc32/2006.1/G4 (stable) Cause: 11 Mar 2007; Samuli Suominen <drac@gentoo.org> mousepad-0.2.2.ebuild, -mousepad-0.2.2-r1.ebuild: Porting to Modular X.
Some small xfce4-panel plugins were mistakenly revbumped to begin with, and each plugin had it's own bug. Those bugs were stale ones from last summer and clearly not going anywhere. I decided to make some QA and fix xfce-extra category. And yes, when doing that I punted the useless, duplicated ebuilds from tree causing some downgrades. I recognize downgrades are not wanted, but I did that in favour of not keeping duplicates in tree. I suppose you don't want me to restore duplicates to tree?
0.2.2-r1 -> 0.2.2 on default-linux/alpha/2006.1 (stable) 0.2.2-r1 -> 0.2.2 on default-linux/hppa/2006.1 (stable) 0.2.2-r1 -> 0.2.2 on default-linux/ppc/ppc32/2006.1 (stable) 0.2.2-r1 -> 0.2.2 on hardened/ppc (stable) 0.2.2-r1 -> 0.2.2 on selinux/ppc/ppc32/2006.1/G3 (stable) 0.2.2-r1 -> 0.2.2 on selinux/ppc/ppc32/2006.1/G4 (stable) False positives, both hppa and ppc has mousepad-0.2.12 marked stable.
well, I'm not going to restore duplicate ebuild in tree to avoid downgrade on alpha. alpha folks, sorry about the revdowngrade.
Latest version keyworded now along with all the other xfce stuff.
Closing with proper resolution.
I'd like to add that after talking with kloeri I've restored the ebuild, and got a new perspective to whole issue. Sincerily apology for all the inconvience this may have caused.
