Let's bump it.
You sure it's worth? :) (tried that quite some time ago) $ diff -Naur eclipse-ecj-3.2 eclipse-ecj-3.2.1 $
3.2.2 sounds more useful, has lots of changes in code, although many look like formatting at first look, at least there's this: -compiler.version = 0.670, 3.2.0 release +compiler.version = v_677_R32x, 3.2.1 release
(In reply to comment #1) > You sure it's worth? :) (tried that quite some time ago) > $ diff -Naur eclipse-ecj-3.2 eclipse-ecj-3.2.1 > $ > OK, not entirely true, there's no difference if comparing ecj from eclipse-sdk 3.2.0 vs 3.2.1 sources tarball, but when downloading ecjsrc.zip from 3.2.1 release separately, it's different than 3.2.0. Also, eclipse-sdk sources tarball for 3.2.2 contains ecj 3.2.1 (the same compared to separate 3.2.1 ecjsrc.zip)... true ecj 3.2.2 is again only in separate ecjsrc.zip for 3.2.2 release (still no build.xml included). Wonder why this mess.
Note that by "ecj from eclipse-sdk full sources zip" I mean the one in ./jdtcoresrc that we (used to) package. But that's not what the SDK really builds and uses, that's in plugins/org.eclipse.jdt.core and that's always at correct version.
In CVS. Unpacked ecjsrc.zip from 3.2.2, added the build.xml files from full eclipse sources and tgz'd a distfile.