Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 16487 - gcc confusion in the FAQ ?
Summary: gcc confusion in the FAQ ?
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Websites
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Other (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: High normal
Assignee: Docs Team
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2003-02-27 12:35 UTC by Rainer Größlinger (RETIRED)
Modified: 2003-06-23 18:06 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Rainer Größlinger (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2003-02-27 12:35:36 UTC
The FAQ says at chapter 2:
"I'm finding things to be really unstable and I'm using "-O9 -ffast-math
-fomit-frame-pointer" optimizations. What gives?
When you use any optimizations beyond -O3, you're [...]"

But gcc 3.x doesn't have anything above -O3, so using -O69 is useless and with
(almost ?) no gcc 2.95 users anymore and with (almost ?) no support for Gentoo
1.2 this could be a bit confusing since someone might believe there _is_
something above -O3.

Perhaps add a little hint that it only applies to gcc 2 or - which would be
better - rephrase that part of the FAQ
Comment 1 Rainer Größlinger (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2003-05-13 15:08:51 UTC
reassigned to docs-team@gentoo.org

btw: it doesn't even apply to gcc 2.9x, so my suggestion would be to just add a little information about nothing bigger than -O3 being available, just to make it clear since "when you use any optimizations beyoond -O3, you're [...]" sounds like "anything higher than -O3" and not "any additional flags".

Ok, I admit I am a bit petty ;)
Comment 2 Jorge Paulo (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2003-06-23 18:06:00 UTC
Note added to FAQ:

---
Don't bother using anything higher than <c>-O3<c> since it isn't support by current versions of gcc.
---