Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 164121 - Please mark dev-java/jfreechart-0.9.21-r2 stable
Summary: Please mark dev-java/jfreechart-0.9.21-r2 stable
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: [OLD] Library (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: High normal
Assignee: Java team
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on: 162950
Blocks:
  Show dependency tree
 
Reported: 2007-01-27 22:56 UTC by Petteri Räty (RETIRED)
Modified: 2007-06-01 17:16 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Petteri Räty (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2007-01-27 22:56:59 UTC
Just a generation 2 migration.
Comment 1 N. Dan Smith 2007-01-30 22:06:02 UTC
This bug depends on 162950 for PPC.
Comment 2 Christian Faulhammer (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2007-02-01 08:22:11 UTC
x86 stable
Comment 3 Steve Dibb (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2007-02-03 14:31:50 UTC
amd64 stable
Comment 4 Petteri Räty (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2007-02-18 18:11:53 UTC
(In reply to comment #1)
> This bug depends on 162950 for PPC.
> 

PPC: That is fixed nowadays.
Comment 5 nixnut (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2007-03-10 18:42:20 UTC
(In reply to comment #4)
> (In reply to comment #1)
> > This bug depends on 162950 for PPC.
> > 
> 
> PPC: That is fixed nowadays.
> 
Unfortunately the problem with dev-java/gnu-jaxp-1.3 hasn't gone. Can you fix that or should we forget this version and try for jfreechart-1.0.4 instead?
Comment 6 Petteri Räty (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2007-03-10 18:55:40 UTC
(In reply to comment #5)
> > 
> Unfortunately the problem with dev-java/gnu-jaxp-1.3 hasn't gone. Can you fix
> that or should we forget this version and try for jfreechart-1.0.4 instead?
> 

1.0* is not API compatible and as such is in a different SLOT.
Comment 7 Vlastimil Babka (Caster) (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2007-05-26 10:20:24 UTC
Let's stabilize 0.9.21-r2 that removes gnu-jaxp dep which was completely unused anyway.
Comment 8 Christian Faulhammer (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2007-05-26 14:39:43 UTC
x86 stable
Comment 9 Peter Weller (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2007-05-27 11:12:42 UTC
Is there any reason amd64 is still CC'd?
Comment 10 Vlastimil Babka (Caster) (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2007-05-27 12:11:17 UTC
(In reply to comment #9)
> Is there any reason amd64 is still CC'd?
 
Yeah because opfer sux and stabled it on amd64 and not x86 :) Since I don't know what did he really test it on, adding both arches back.
Comment 11 Peter Weller (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2007-05-27 14:05:54 UTC
And I've just tested on amd64, so... amd64 done ;)
Comment 12 Christian Faulhammer (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2007-05-27 15:08:48 UTC
(In reply to comment #10)
> (In reply to comment #9)
> > Is there any reason amd64 is still CC'd?
> Yeah because opfer sux and stabled it on amd64 and not x86 :) Since I don't
> know what did he really test it on, adding both arches back.

 Pah.  Do your keywording alone....Java sucks! :-P  And remember, I don't test, I give away stable keywords randomly.
Comment 13 nixnut (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2007-06-01 17:16:34 UTC
stable on ppc. closing since we're last.