Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 163398 - djbdns-1.05-r20 with USE=ipv6 fails to use DJBDNS_PATCH_DIR patches
Summary: djbdns-1.05-r20 with USE=ipv6 fails to use DJBDNS_PATCH_DIR patches
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: New packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: High normal (vote)
Assignee: Michael Hanselmann (hansmi) (RETIRED)
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2007-01-23 06:09 UTC by Daniel Black (RETIRED)
Modified: 2007-01-28 22:00 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments
djbdns-1.05-r20.ebuild.patch (djbdns-1.05-r20.ebuild.patch,598 bytes, patch)
2007-01-23 06:09 UTC, Daniel Black (RETIRED)
Details | Diff

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Daniel Black (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2007-01-23 06:09:31 UTC
when USE=ipv6 the cd to "${S}-noipv6" means that user DJBDNS_PATCH_DIR are never applied (unless they are to dnstrace patches).

Also use=fwdonly was dropped so I assume the patch isn't needed.
Comment 1 Daniel Black (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2007-01-23 06:09:52 UTC
Created attachment 107870 [details, diff]
djbdns-1.05-r20.ebuild.patch
Comment 2 Michael Hanselmann (hansmi) (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2007-01-23 18:00:04 UTC
Fixed in CVS, thanks.
Comment 3 Daniel Black (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2007-01-23 20:06:21 UTC
nice improvement to account for both - thanks
Comment 4 Daniel Black (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2007-01-24 21:20:40 UTC
(In reply to comment #3)
> nice improvement to account for both - thanks
> 
Nice improvement until you try to use it (sorry I should of tested it first). I found the ipv6 patch hacks about every definition of a function, and lots of argument passing. The downside is its pretty impossible to generate a patch that works on the ipv6 source and the unpatched ipv4 source.

Recommend not patching the ${S}-noipv6 with the same patches as ${S} as it causes more problems that the one (dnstrace patching) that it solves.
Comment 5 Michael Hanselmann (hansmi) (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2007-01-28 22:00:37 UTC
(In reply to comment #4)
> Nice improvement until you try to use it (sorry I should of tested it first). 

Yes, so should I have. :-) Fixed now as you suggested.