Bug 160387 – Bugzilla-2.22 default bug test

• Status: VERIFIED FIXED
• Product: Gentoo Infrastructure

[Description Jakub Moc (RETIRED) 2007-01-06 09:26:03 UTC]

Hmmm...

Reproducible: Always

[Comment 1 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) 2007-01-06 09:27:29 UTC]

robbat2: please :)

Hardware should default to All, not Other
Priority should default to P2, not P1

[Comment 2 Robin Johnson 2007-01-06 10:01:00 UTC]

Priority set to default to P2.
The sortkeys for Hardware are already set to have All as the default. Where do you see otherwise?

P.S. Please file bugzilla bugs in the correct product!

[Comment 3 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) 2007-01-06 10:04:55 UTC]

(In reply to comment #2)
> Priority set to default to P2.
> The sortkeys for Hardware are already set to have All as the default. Where do
> you see otherwise?

http://bugs.gentoo.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=Gentoo%20Linux&format=guided - see the Hardware Platform there; still default to other for me.

> P.S. Please file bugzilla bugs in the correct product!

I didn't mean to file a bugzilla bug, I was testing the defaults :) 

[Comment 4 Robin Johnson 2007-01-06 10:12:28 UTC]

Here is the raw template code.
I don't know why it's choosing Other for hardware.
  <tr bgcolor="[% tablecolour %]">
    <td align="right" valign="top">
      <b>Hardware Platform</b>
    </td>
    <td valign="top">
      [% PROCESS select sel = 'rep_platform' %]
    </td>
  </tr>

  <tr>
    <td align="right" valign="top">
      <b>Operating System</b>
    </td>
    <td valign="top">
      [% PROCESS select sel = 'op_sys' %]
    </td>
  </tr>

[Comment 5 Alon Bar-Lev (RETIRED) 2007-01-06 10:28:05 UTC]

Hi!
Just got a mail from bug#130879 (2006-04-23 01:22 -0800)
Hum?

[Comment 6 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) 2007-01-06 10:58:19 UTC]

(In reply to comment #3)
> (In reply to comment #2)
> > Priority set to default to P2.

Doesn't seem to work... Bug 160409

[Comment 7 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) 2007-01-06 10:58:29 UTC]

*** Bug 160409 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Comment 8 Robin Johnson 2007-01-06 11:05:19 UTC]

*** Bug 160413 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Comment 9 Robin Johnson 2007-01-06 11:05:36 UTC]

ok, it is properly fixed now

[Comment 10 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) 2007-01-06 11:16:47 UTC]

(In reply to comment #9)
> ok, it is properly fixed now

Cool, thanks!