Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 159651 - xmame lost skip_disclaimer option
Summary: xmame lost skip_disclaimer option
Status: RESOLVED UPSTREAM
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: [OLD] Games (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: High normal (vote)
Assignee: Gentoo Games
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2007-01-01 14:40 UTC by Paul B. Henson
Modified: 2007-08-13 01:28 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments
Add back skip_disclaimer option (skip_disclaimer.patch,769 bytes, patch)
2007-01-01 14:41 UTC, Paul B. Henson
Details | Diff

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Paul B. Henson 2007-01-01 14:40:14 UTC
I recently updated xmame, and noticed the skip_disclaimer option had been removed. I'm not exactly sure why, looking at their mailing lists whenever someone asks about it the general response is that the disclaimer is only shown once so the option isn't really needed.

However, I have a diskless Mythbox running Mythgame mounting ROMS readonly over NFS. So, everytime I turn it on, the disclaimer is shown for every game, which is a bit annoying.

The actual option still exists in the code, all that was removed was the entry in the configuration option parser. Adding it back in is a tiny diff, which I'll attach after submission. Any chance this could be added to the ebuild? I already created a local ebuild in my overlay incorporating it, but it would be nice not to have to update it everytime the real ebuild changes.

Thanks...
Comment 1 Paul B. Henson 2007-01-01 14:41:07 UTC
Created attachment 105113 [details, diff]
Add back skip_disclaimer option
Comment 2 Chris Gianelloni (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2007-01-10 00:27:06 UTC
Well, we won't want to maintain the patch with every version bump as much as you won't want to update your overlay ebuild.  The best bet is to get upstream to revert the change.
Comment 3 Paul B. Henson 2007-01-10 01:37:13 UTC
> Well, we won't want to maintain the patch with every version bump as much as
> you won't want to update your overlay ebuild.

Granted :).

>The best bet is to get upstream to revert the change.

Doesn't seem likely, not sure what bee is in their bonnet on this issue...

Thanks for your consideration.
Comment 4 Jerry McBride 2007-08-13 01:28:45 UTC
The patch can also be used to apply "skip_warnings"... Just in case you have a need