Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 158828 - sci-misc/gri postscript output option patch
Summary: sci-misc/gri postscript output option patch
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: New packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: High normal (vote)
Assignee: Gentoo Science Related Packages
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2006-12-22 06:24 UTC by Sebastiaan
Modified: 2008-11-03 13:53 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---


Attachments
gri-2.12.13-postscript.patch (gri-2.12.13-postscript.patch,3.75 KB, patch)
2006-12-22 06:25 UTC, Sebastiaan
Details | Diff
gri-2.12.13-r1.ebuild (gri-2.12.13-r1.ebuild,1.48 KB, application/octet-stream)
2006-12-22 06:25 UTC, Sebastiaan
Details

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Sebastiaan 2006-12-22 06:24:15 UTC
By default, gri exports postscript files as EPS. This causes problems with multipage outputs, and is undesired for full-page output files.

According to this bug report: 
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1493002&group_id=5511&atid=105511

I wrote a patch which adds an option -postscript which produces the correct postscript header.
Comment 1 Sebastiaan 2006-12-22 06:25:14 UTC
Created attachment 104573 [details, diff]
gri-2.12.13-postscript.patch
Comment 2 Sebastiaan 2006-12-22 06:25:42 UTC
Created attachment 104574 [details]
gri-2.12.13-r1.ebuild
Comment 3 Markus Dittrich (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2008-09-27 10:51:03 UTC
I believe this has been addressed in the more recent
gri versions. Could you please confirm so we can close
this bug.

Thanks,
Markus
Comment 4 Sebastiaan 2008-10-30 10:16:24 UTC
I have checked version 2.12.18, and the patch has *not* been added. GRI still produces the EPSF header (without an option to turn it off), and in the bugtracker it is still listed as a bug.
Comment 5 Markus Dittrich (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2008-11-01 15:14:10 UTC
Thank you very much for your update. I've ported
your patch to 2.12.18 and added it to portage. Thanks
again for providing it. Maybe you can give upstream
another nudge ;)

best,
Markus
Comment 6 Sebastiaan 2008-11-03 10:24:07 UTC
Works like a charm and given another nudge :) I don't really understand the problem they mentioned there though.

I tried 2.12.18 before, but the patch was not there, and now it is. Should this not be 2.12.18-r1 to prevent confusion?
Comment 7 Markus Dittrich (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2008-11-03 13:53:05 UTC
(In reply to comment #6)
> I tried 2.12.18 before, but the patch was not there, and now it is. Should this
> not be 2.12.18-r1 to prevent confusion?
> 

It could have been -r1 and I was pondering this. Since most users seemed to be
unaffected by this issue (given lack of cc's and comments here) I decided to
not force them all to recompile the package. In retrospect, pushing out -r1
might have probably been more sensible. Oh well, next time.

I am glad it works though.

cheers,
Markus