The upstream location for JAI appears to have changed. The new URL http://jai.dev.java.net/binary-builds.html allows downloads without any license click-thru, so it should be possible to move away from the fetch restriction now.
Thanks. I just updated the existing ebuild for now, because the distfile is the very same. For the new version we shall look at the build from source possibility.
(In reply to comment #1) > Thanks. I just updated the existing ebuild for now, because the distfile is the > very same. For the new version we shall look at the build from source > possibility. > http://download.java.net/media/jai/builds/release/1_1_3/DISTRIBUTIONREADME-jai.txt Do we really want to do this? (e) You agree to defend and indemnify Sun and its licensors from and against any damages, costs, liabilities, settlement amounts and/or expenses (including attorneys' fees) incurred in connection with any claim, lawsuit or action by any third party that arises or results from the use or distribution of any and all Programs and/or Redistributable.
https://jai.dev.java.net/jdl-jai.pdf Well it does seem that the jdl does not have the same terms.
Reopening as in the three there still is the sun-bcla-jai license in the ebuild. LICENSE="sun-bcla-jai"
(In reply to comment #4) > Reopening as in the three there still is the sun-bcla-jai license in the > ebuild. > LICENSE="sun-bcla-jai" > The license for binary distfiles didn't change, it's still bcla. See it at https://jai.dev.java.net/binary-builds.html and in the distfile (which didn't change at all) itself. But since there is no longer needed the click-through for download, we don't need the fetch restriction, or am I wrong? I've added RESTRICT="mirror" to be safe from the "defend Sun" clause, you think it's fine now? http://www.pbfcomics.com?cid=PBF207-Gingerbread_Man.jpg#197
Uhh, blame my clipboard for the last link on the previous comment, well enjoy :)
Assuming it's fine
