Bug 156629 – net-misc/hamachi minorsyns and it should have -* keyword

• Status: RESOLVED FIXED
• Product: Gentoo Linux

[Description Timothy Redaelli (RETIRED) 2006-11-29 09:14:34 UTC]

net-misc/hamachi ebuild has some minor QA issues:
  ebuild.minorsyn                13
   net-misc/hamachi/hamachi-0.9.9.9_p20-r2.ebuild: Trailing whitespace Syntax Error. Line 5
   net-misc/hamachi/hamachi-0.9.9.9_p20-r2.ebuild: Leading Space Syntax Error. Line 24
   net-misc/hamachi/hamachi-0.9.9.9_p20-r2.ebuild: Leading Space Syntax Error. Line 26
   net-misc/hamachi/hamachi-0.9.9.9_p20-r2.ebuild: Leading Space Syntax Error. Line 31
   net-misc/hamachi/hamachi-0.9.9.9_p20-r2.ebuild: Trailing whitespace Syntax Error. Line 36
   net-misc/hamachi/hamachi-0.9.9.9_p20-r2.ebuild: Trailing whitespace Syntax Error. Line 47
   net-misc/hamachi/hamachi-0.9.9.9_p20-r2.ebuild: Trailing whitespace Syntax Error. Line 51
   net-misc/hamachi/hamachi-0.9.9.9_p20-r2.ebuild: Trailing whitespace Syntax Error. Line 57
   net-misc/hamachi/hamachi-0.9.9.9_p20-r2.ebuild: Trailing whitespace Syntax Error. Line 64
   net-misc/hamachi/hamachi-0.9.9.9_p20-r2.ebuild: Trailing whitespace Syntax Error. Line 70
   net-misc/hamachi/hamachi-0.9.9.9_p20-r2.ebuild: Trailing whitespace Syntax Error. Line 73
   net-misc/hamachi/hamachi-0.9.9.9_p20-r2.ebuild: Trailing whitespace Syntax Error. Line 96
   net-misc/hamachi/hamachi-0.9.9.9_p20-r2.ebuild: Trailing whitespace Syntax Error. Line 100

And it should has -* keyword

[Comment 1 Caleb Tennis (RETIRED) 2006-12-06 05:03:02 UTC]

fixed the minorsyns...why -* ?

[Comment 2 Timothy Redaelli (RETIRED) 2006-12-07 08:08:22 UTC]

(In reply to comment #1)
> fixed the minorsyns...why -* ?

because is a binary package, only available for x86 

[Comment 3 Alec Warner (RETIRED) 2006-12-07 09:00:22 UTC]

(In reply to comment #2)
> (In reply to comment #1)
> > fixed the minorsyns...why -* ?
> 
> because is a binary package, only available for x86 
> 

so mask it in base and unmask it on x86.

[Comment 4 Ciaran McCreesh 2006-12-07 09:07:49 UTC]

(In reply to comment #3)
> so mask it in base and unmask it on x86.

No no. -* (~)x86 is the correct keywording for a package that will only ever work on x86 due to it being a binary or requiring special hardware.

[Comment 5 Alec Warner (RETIRED) 2006-12-07 10:22:40 UTC]

Actually either way works ;)

[Comment 6 Pierce Ward 2006-12-09 09:47:05 UTC]

I've tested this on a amd64 system, and it compiles and works perfectly. Can we get a ~amd64 keyboard?

[Comment 7 Caleb Tennis (RETIRED) 2006-12-14 16:08:50 UTC]

pierce - certainly, just open a new bug and cc [e-mail] on it.

[Comment 8 Steve Dibb (RETIRED) 2007-01-04 15:03:06 UTC]

fixed by your friendly neighborhood qa dev. :)