Gentoo Websites Logo
Go to: Gentoo Home Documentation Forums Lists Bugs Planet Store Wiki Get Gentoo!
Bug 153464 - apps that depend on removed sys-apps/dbus-core
Summary: apps that depend on removed sys-apps/dbus-core
Status: VERIFIED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Gentoo Linux
Classification: Unclassified
Component: New packages (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: High normal (vote)
Assignee: Project Gentopia
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2006-10-30 10:46 UTC by Alessandro Guido
Modified: 2006-11-02 00:23 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Package list:
Runtime testing required: ---

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Alessandro Guido 2006-10-30 10:46:45 UTC 
The dependency in the ebuild needs to be updated following the package move.
Comment 1 Walter Meinl 2006-10-30 10:59:37 UTC 
The same is true for dev-python/dbus-python-0.71 and dev-libs/dbus-qt3-old-0.70
depending both on non-existent dbus-core
Comment 2 Doug Goldstein (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-10-30 11:54:45 UTC 
Right. These packages are masked. We are working on them and working on other bits. They're known to be broken and known not to work. Dependencies are not correct and probably will not be correct for a week or so until we can get through the whole tree. We've gone ahead and fixed these for you for now. However, other packages will break. Don't file bug reports for different named packages/dependencies  until there's an unmask.
Comment 3 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-10-31 00:31:18 UTC 
kde-misc/kdbus-0.8.6
net-dns/avahi-0.6.14
net-print/cups-1.2.4
net-print/cups-1.2.5
Comment 4 Doug Goldstein (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-10-31 06:06:44 UTC 
*stabs jakub* It's a masked package. Deal with it. I know there's breaks...
Comment 5 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-10-31 06:15:33 UTC 
(In reply to comment #4)
> *stabs jakub* It's a masked package. Deal with it. I know there's breaks...

You've missed the point, I guess... If you decided to remove it, then it would be nice to clean up after yourself, I'd say. ;) None of the packages in Comment #3 is actually masked, they just have non-existant deps now.
Comment 6 Doug Goldstein (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-10-31 21:04:21 UTC 
Fixed for you Jakub. :)
Comment 7 Jakub Moc (RETIRED) gentoo-dev 2006-11-02 00:23:09 UTC 
Thanks! :)